Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court held that the application may be withdrawn with liberty to raise the pleaded points at a later stage, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

Summary

Rahul Kumar filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending application in criminal miscellaneous case No.14264 of 2024. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, requested that the withdrawal be allowed while preserving the liberty to raise all points and grounds later during the trial. The court considered the request and, without expressing any view on the merits of the underlying case, granted the prayer. It ordered that the application be withdrawn with the liberty to raise the pleaded grounds at an appropriate stage. The order explicitly stated that no substantive opinion on the merits was rendered by the court.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for withdrawing an application pending before the High Court?
  • Does the court have the authority to permit withdrawal while preserving the petitioner’s right to raise the same grounds later?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • high court order
  • liberty to raise points
  • no merits opinion

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14264 of 2024
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-688 Year-2023 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Rahul Kumar Son of Bijendra Ray R/o - Chaubey Gali, P.S.- Danapur,
                  District- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar Patna

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    17-03-2026                  At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

                    seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to

                    raise all the points available to him and also the grounds pleaded

                    in this application at the appropriate stage during the trial.

                                 2. Prayer is allowed.

                                 3. This application is permitted to be withdrawn with

                    the liberty aforesaid.

                                 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed

                    any opinion on the merits of this case.



                                               (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.