Patna High Court
Prasant AnandversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- KHATIM REZA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to bond and surety conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Summary
Petitioners Prasant Anand and Shankar Prasad Sah sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Kadwa P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 308(3), 318(4), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered into a land sale agreement, received part payment and then demanded an additional extortion sum of Rs. 20 lakh. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, that the dispute was essentially civil concerning the price and execution of the land agreement, and that they had no knowledge of the market value at the time of contract. They submitted that they had sent a legal notice to the informant for breach of contract and sought bail. The Court, noting the civil nature of the underlying dispute, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case involving alleged extortion and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Whether the dispute is civil in nature, warranting bail despite the criminal allegations
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 308(3), 318(4), 3(5), 351(2), 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- extortion
- land dispute
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Section 482
- civil dispute
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14360 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2025 Thana- KADWA District- Katihar
======================================================
1. Prasant Anand, Son of Shankar Prasad Sah, R/o Permanent Add - Sonali
Bazar, P.S. - Kadwa, Dist. - Katihar(Bihar).
2. Shankar Prasad Sah, Son of Late Thakur Prasad Sah, R/o Permanent Add -
Sonali Bazar, P.S. - Kadwa, Dist. - Katihar(Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Ram Das Kundoo, S/o Late Rohit Das Kundoo, Resident of Village Potni
Colony, Sonaili, P.S. Kadwa, Dist. Katihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sujit Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP
For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
ORAL ORDER
3 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with
Kadwa P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025, registered
for the offence punishable under Sections 308(3), 318(4), 351(2)
and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that an agreement
was entered in between the informant and the petitioners for
1.89.250 acres of land for consideration amount of Rs.
2,01,00,000/- and the informant paid Rs. 1,28,51,000/- to the
petitioners but the accused persons executed only 53 decimals
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14360 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026
2/3
of land in favour of informant and others. When the informant
asked accused petitioner no. 1 regarding the same, he demanded
extortion money of Rs. 20 lakhs.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in
this case. It is submitted that petitioner no. 1 is son of petitioner
no. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner no. 1 was not aware
about the prevailing market value of the property for which he
had entered into an agreement of his costly land in lower value
and the informant took benefit of the same. Thereafter,
petitioner no. 1 immediately contacted the informant and asked
to pay the price as per the prevailing market value or terminate
the agreement. Petitioner no. 1 also sent a legal notice to the
informant for breach of contract and cancellation of the
agreement. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioner no. 1 has
clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has one criminal case
against him.
5. Learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the
informant has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Since the nature of dispute is of civil in nature, I am
inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Having considered the facts and circumstances of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14360 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026
3/3
the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in
the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioners within a period
of six weeks from today, in connection with Kadwa P.S. Case
No. 38 of 2025, they shall be released on anticipatory bail upon
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned C.J.M., Katihar, subject to condition as laid down under
Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S..
(Khatim Reza, J)
prabhat/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.