Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sri Nagendra Das @ Mahanth Nagendra DasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner, subject to a bond and sureties, as the circumstances did not justify its denial.

Summary

The petitioner, Nagendra Das, a puja priest and member of the managing committee of a temple, was implicated in a complaint alleging offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 471 and 120B for allegedly diverting income from advertising hoardings installed on temple premises into his personal account. The prosecution argued that he, together with his son and an advertising firm, conspired to misuse temple funds, while the petitioner contended that the allegations were false, that the land and assets were transferred to him under traditional guru‑shishya customs, and that all income was used for temple activities. He applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest, and the State opposed the relief. The Court examined the nature of the alleged offences, the possibility of the petitioner’s surrender, and the principles governing anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC. Finding no compelling reason to deny bail and noting the petitioner’s clean antecedents, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties. The order directed that if arrested within eight weeks, the petitioner be released on bail under the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC in view of the alleged offences under IPC sections 406, 420, 467, 471 and 120B?
  • Whether the nature of the alleged offences and the circumstances of the case warrant denial of anticipatory bail?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • criminal breach of trust
  • cheating
  • forgery
  • criminal conspiracy
  • temple management
  • religious institution

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14439 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2421 Year-2024 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                          Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Sri Nagendra Das @ Mahanth Nagendra Das S/o Late Rameshwar Dubey
                 Chela @ Late Mahanth Baidehi Sharan R/o Rajapur Pul, Gate no. 29, Siya
                 Bihari Kunj Thakurbari, P.s.- Shri Krishnapuri, Distt.- Patna


                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Sanjay Singh, Sr.Advocate with
                                                Mr. Rudrank Shivam Singh, Adv.
                                                Mr. Rqanvir Pratap Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP

                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-02-2026                   Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint

                   Case No. 2421 of 2024, punishable for the offence under

                   Sections 406, 420, 467, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

                                 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that this petitioner,

                   who is Pujari and Member of the Managing Committee of Sri

                   Ram Janki Siya Bihari Kunj Thakurbari Nyash Samittee along

                   with his son Manikant Kumar and Shahnawaz Ali, proprietor of

                   Pooja Advertising Company, committed illegal acts relating to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14439 of 2026(2) dt.27-02-2026
                                            2/4




          temple management. Following complaints by co-villagers, the

          Bihar Rajya Dharmic Nyash Parishad conducted an inspection,

          found the allegations to be true and constituted a new committee

          of 11 members. Despite directions of the committee to submit

          details of temple income and expenditure, Nagendra Das

          (petitioner herein) allegedly failed to comply the direction. It

          was found that advertising hoardings were installed in the

          temple premises and an agreement was executed between

          Manikant Kumar and Pooja Advertising Company. Investigation

          revealed that income from the hoardings was deposited into the

          personal account of petitioner and was misused.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is Mahanth of Shri Ram Janki Siya Bihari Kunj

          Thakurbari Mandir and also a member of the Adhoc Committee

          constituted on 05.09.2023. The petitioner has been serving and

          offering prayers at the Mandir, as Mahanth, since 1994 after

          passing of his guru. The present complaint has been filed by

          Secretary of Shri Ram Janki Siya Bihari Kunj Thakurbari

          Mandir against petitioner only with a view to malign the

          reputation of petitioner. Petitioner has been handling the affairs

          of the Matha for nearly 30 years and all the payments were

          utilized in organizing puja and in the upkeep of the Matha. So
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14439 of 2026(2) dt.27-02-2026
                                            3/4




          far as allegation of getting a portion of the Matha registered in

          the petitioner's name is concerned, it is pertinent to mention here

          that said land was earlier registered in the name of Mahanth

          Baidehi Nandani and after his death, same was transferred in the

          name of his disciple Mahanth Baidehi Sharan and thereafter

          following the same tradition, as part of Guru-Shishya

          Parampara, the land was registered in the name of this

          petitioner by virtue of being his disciple, which was finally

          registered on 04.01.2006 in the name of this petitioner.

          Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail.

                       6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the

          prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender before

          the Trial Court within a period of eight weeks from today, let the

          above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

          Magistrate, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No.

          2421(C) of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under

          Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14439 of 2026(2) dt.27-02-2026
                                                       4/4




                     of the B.N.S.S., 2023.



                                                       (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.