Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chunnu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Chunnu Yadav, was charged under multiple provisions of the Bihar Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly inappropriately touching an informant. The prosecution relied on the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Bihar Negotiable Something Statute, asserting that the petitioner committed the alleged offences. The petitioner, a student with no prior criminal record, pleaded innocence and sought regular bail, arguing that he had been falsely implicated and had been in judicial custody since 25‑09‑2025. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the Court found no compelling reason to deny bail and ordered the petitioner’s release on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Special Judge handling the POCSO case.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted in offences punishable under sections 74, 75, 78, 352, 351(2) of the Bihar Penal Code, section 8 of the POCSO Act and sections of the SC/ST Act.
  • Whether the evidence, including the victim’s statement under Section 183, justifies denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner poses a flight risk or a risk of tampering with evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • POCSO
  • sexual assault
  • SC/ST Act
  • Bihar Penal Code
  • criminal procedure
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14507 of 2026
                                               In
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4532 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-287 Year-2025 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Chunnu Yadav Son of Kashi Ray @ Kashinath Ray Resident Of Village -
                 Balua Narayanpur, Ps- Amnaur, Dist- Saran at Chhapra

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    XXX D/o- YYY Resident Of Village - Bagahi, Ps- Amnaur, Dist- Saran at
                 Chhapra

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sadanand Paswan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   23-06-2026                   Despite service of notice no one has appeared on behalf

                   of the O.P. No. 2.

                                2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                3. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under sections 74, 75, 78,

                   352, 351(2) of BNS and under section 8 of POCSO Act and under

                   sections 3(I) (w), 3(I) (Gha), 3(I) (da) of SC. ST. Act.

                                4. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has

                   inappropriately touched the informant.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

                   the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14507 of 2026(7) dt.23-06-2026
                                                          2/2




                        falsely been implicated in this case and during the investigation,

                        victim has given her statement under Section 183 of BNSS wherein

                        she has supported the case of the prosecution and from the statement

                        of the victim, it is clear that the petitioner has inappropriately

                        touched the informant. Petitioner is a student and he is having no

                        criminal antecedents. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial

                        custody since 25.09.2025.

                                     6. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                        opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                                     7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                        considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                        inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                        petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                        Amnour P.S. Case No. 287 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                        Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

                        to the satisfaction of Learned Court of Exclusive Special Judge

                        POCSO-cum-Additional Sessions Judge Saran at Chhapra.



                                              (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sneha/-
Dolly/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.