Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bharat Kumar @ Bharat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail and ordered his release upon furnishing the prescribed bail bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Bharat Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder‑related case (PS Kavaiya Case No. 201 of 2024) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed by his in‑laws after a matrimonial dispute, while the defence argued that the death resulted from poisoning and that the petitioner was falsely implicated. The FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident, and the post‑mortem report identified zinc phosphide, a rat poison, with only a single bruise on the body. A witness statement suggesting a dying declaration was presented, but it did not identify who administered the poison. Considering the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner, his clean record, and the circumstances of the investigation, the Court inclined to grant regular bail. The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the BNS.
  • Whether the evidence, including the delayed FIR, post‑mortem findings, and the alleged dying declaration, sufficiently links the petitioner to the alleged crime.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • murder
  • poisoning
  • dying declaration
  • delayed FIR
  • post‑mortem report
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14537 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2024 Thana- Kavaiya District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Bharat Kumar @ Bharat Yadav S/o Raj Kumar Yadav @ Sadhu D.J. Resident
                 of Village- Pachna Road Sansar Pokhar, P.S.- Kabayia, Dist.- Lakhisarai

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   15-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for grant of regular bail

                   in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 190, 191, 103, 118, 238, 61(2), 62 and 123 of the

                   BNS.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   deceased had gone to his matrimonial house, where, due to

                   some matrimonial dispute, he was allegedly killed by his in-

                   laws.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

                   present case. It is further submitted that the occurrence is

                   alleged to have taken place on 05.09.2024, whereas the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14537 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026
                                            2/3




          complaint was filed on 11.09.2024, i.e., with a delay of six days,

          which remains unexplained. It is further submitted that, during

          the course of investigation, it has transpired that the deceased

          was initially taken to a hospital and thereafter referred to

          Rajeshwar Hospital, Patna. It is further submitted that the

          petitioner and others, in their defence statements, have stated

          that the deceased had consumed poison.

                       5. It is also contended that from perusal of the

          complaint petition, it appears that the deceased was assaulted;

          however, there is nothing on record to show that the petitioner

          either assaulted the deceased or administered poison to him. It is

          further submitted that the doctor conducting the post-mortem

          examination found only one bruise on the body of the deceased

          and preserved the viscera. The FSL report indicates that zinc

          phosphide was detected in the dark brown fluid. Zinc phosphide

          is a severe gastrointestinal irritant commonly used as a rat

          poison. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial

          custody since 24.10.2025 having no criminal antecedent.

                       6. Learned counsel appearing for the informant has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that,

          during the course of investigation, as stated in paragraph 35 of

          the case diary, one witness, Raja Ram, has stated that he had
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14537 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      gone to Rajeshwar Hospital where the deceased allegedly told

                      him that poison had been administered to him. It is submitted

                      that this statement may be treated as a dying declaration.

                      However, even from the statement of the said witness, it is not

                      clear as to who had administered the poison.

                                   7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                      of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on

                      bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail

                      in connection with Kavaiya P.S. Case No. 201 of 2024, on

                      furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the

                      learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Jagdish/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.