Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging his involvement in the murder of an informant's son under Sections 302 and 34 IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim, leading to his death. The petitioner contended that the allegations were vague, general and that a co‑accused had already been granted anticipatory bail in a similar case. The court noted the precedent and the lack of specific incriminating material against the petitioner. Accordingly, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties, directing release if arrested within four weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC despite allegations of murder under Sections 302 and 34 IPC.
  • Whether the general and omnibus nature of the allegations precludes the grant of bail.
  • Whether the grant of anticipatory bail to a similarly situated co‑accused is determinative.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS
  • murder
  • bail jurisprudence
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14556 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2022 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Deepak Kumar S/O Satyanarayan Bhagat R/O Vill.- Bahdinpur, P.S- Paroo,
                 Dist.- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Choubey Jawahar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                     1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                   2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail,

                   arises out of Paroo Police Station Case No. 95 of 2022,

                   disclosing offences under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian

                   Penal Code.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, on 06.03.2022, in

                   the afternoon, Vijay Bhagat, son of Satyanarayan Bhagat, came

                   to the house of the informant and took his son Ashutosh alias

                   Munna with him. Both Vijay Bhagat and Ashutosh Kumar alias

                   Munna were friends. It has further been alleged that when the

                   informant's son did not return in the night, then in the early

                   morning, at about 4 a.m., the informant and his son and other

                   family members went to the house of Satyanarayan Bhagat and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14556 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          saw that fifteen to twenty persons were standing there. The co-

          accused, Satyanarayan Bhagat and his family members, said that

          informant's son met with an accident and thereafter, the

          petitioner and other accused persons brought his son Ashutosh

          Kumar alias Munna from the house by dragging and assaulting

          him. It has further been alleged that the co-accused persons

          named in the FIR, including the petitioner, badly assaulted the

          informant's son with lathi, danda due to which he died.

                          4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          the petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner

          alleged and the allegation against him is general and omnibus in

          nature. He further submits that on the same day, Satyanarayan

          Bhagat, who is father of the petitioner, has lodged the FIR

          against the deceased Ashutosh Kumar alias Munna and his

          another friend bearing Paroo PS Case No. 96 of 2022, alleging

          that the son of Satyanarayan Bhagat was killed by informant's

          son Ashutosh Kumar alias Munna and others after calling the

          deceased from his home with a planning. The mob which was

          assembled there near the dead body of the brother of the

          petitioner attacked the informant's son and due to which

          multiple injuries have been caused to the deceased. The co-

          accused Brahmadev Bhagat, who is also named in the FIR, has
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14556 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this

                     Court in Cr. Misc. No. 65756 of 2024 vide order dated

                     02.12.2024.

                                     5. Having regard to the submissions made on

                     behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that

                     similarly situated co-accused person has been granted

                     anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, I am

                     inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

                                     6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

                                     7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

                     his arrest or surrender before the Court below within four

                     weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

                     10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                     each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial

                     Magistrate (West) Muzaffarpur, in connection with Paroo Police

                     Station Case No. 95 of 2022, subject to the condition laid down

                     under      Section      438     (2)     of    the    Code   of   Criminal

                     Procedure/Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.



                                              (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.