Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dhirendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail must be granted because the injuries were non‑serious, the dispute was private, and the circumstances did not justify continued detention.

Summary

The petitioners, three brothers, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Fatehpur PS Case No. 729 of 2025) that alleged they assaulted an informant and his wife and stole personal items. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners chased the informant, assaulted him with a lathi, iron rod and fists, and also assaulted his wife, causing injuries. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, that a counter‑complaint (Case No. 739 of 2025) existed showing they were themselves assaulted, and that the injuries to the informant and his wife were minor and arose from a private dispute over sewerage water. The court examined the nature and seriousness of the injuries, the existence of a private dispute, and the petitioners’ antecedents, concluding that the matter did not warrant denial of bail. Accordingly, the court granted bail to each petitioner on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and attendance requirements.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. in view of the alleged offences and the nature of injuries.
  • Whether the existence of a private dispute and the minor nature of injuries justify the release of the accused on bail.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 482(2), 76

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • private dispute
  • minor injuries
  • Section 482
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14632 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-729 Year-2025 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Dhirendra Kumar S/o- Late Suresh Yadav R/v- Sidariya Donaiya PS-
                  Fatehpur Dist- Gayaji
           2.    Jitendra Kumar S/o- Late Suresh Yadav R/v- Sidariya Donaiya PS- Fatehpur
                 Dist- Gayaji
           3.    Gayni Yadav @ Gyani Yadav S/o- Late Sohar Yadav R/v- Sidariya Donaiya
                 PS- Fatehpur Dist- Gayaji

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Onkar Nath, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Md. Fahimuddin, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. In the present case, the petitioners are

                   apprehending their arrest in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case

                   No. 729 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of

                   B.N.S.

                                      3. As per prosecution case, the petitioners and

                   other co-accused persons had been making comment over the

                   informant and his family members and when the informant

                   forbade from doing so, they chased the informant to his house
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14632 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
                                            2/4




          and assaulted the wife of the informant with lathi. They also

          snatched nose-pin and jitia from the wife of the informant.

          When the informant intervened, he was also assaulted with iron

          rod, lathi and fists and slaps as well causing a number of

          injuries.

                            4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in

          this case. There is case and counter version for the occurrence of

          same day. Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 739 of 2025 has been lodged

          by one Bijli Devi, the wife of co-accused Lakhan Yadav as the

          petitioners' side were assaulted by the informant's side causing a

          number of injuries. Learned counsel further submits that the

          injury reports of the informant and his wife show simple and

          superficial injury which are abrasion, bodyache, swelling and

          tenderness on the wife of the informant whereas the informant

          received lacerated wound over parietal region of head of size

          3"x 0.75 and 3"x 0.75 apart from abrasion over parietal region

          of head and swelling over right hand. Subsequently, fracture was

          found on the right hand of the informant. Learned counsel

          further submits that the scuffle took place over drainage of

          sewerage water and both sides sustained injury in course of

          scuffle. There is general and omnibus allegation of assault
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14632 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
                                            3/4




          against all the accused persons. The petitioners and informant

          are agnates. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner no.

          1 is having antecedent of two cases whereas petitioner no. 3 is

          having antecedent of one case and they are on bail in these cases

          and petitioner no. 2 is having clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioners.

                       6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          case and counter version of the parties and also considering the

          non-serious nature of injury received by the informant and his

          wife and further considering the nature of dispute between the

          parties, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their

          arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of

          eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya/concerned court in

          connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 729 of 2025, subject to

          the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

          and other following conditions :

                                          (i) One of the bailors will be a close
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14632 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026
                                                        4/4




                                                      relative of the petitioners.

                                                      (ii) The petitioners will remain present

                                                      on each and every date fixed by the

                                                      court below, if so required by the

                                                      learned trial court.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.