Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bikki Kumar Yadav @ Vikki Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

Bikki Kumar Yadav was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing 205.94 g of a smack‑like contraband recovered from his backpack. The petitioner argued that the seized material was hygroscopic, wrapped in polythene, and its weight could vary; that the seizure was recorded by police personnel who failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS Act and Section 50 of the NDPS Act; that the quantity, though above the ‘small quantity’ threshold, was far below a commercial amount; and that he had no prior criminal record and had been in judicial custody since 12‑12‑2025. The State opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the Court found the arguments on procedural lapses and the modest quantity persuasive and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted under the NDPS Act for possession of 205.94 g of contraband.
  • Whether non‑compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS Act and Section 50 of the NDPS Act vitiates the seizure.
  • Whether the quantity seized, though above the ‘small quantity’ limit, is insufficient to deny bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal antecedents and length of custody affect bail eligibility.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotic possession
  • quantity of contraband
  • procedural compliance
  • police seizure
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14747 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2025 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Bikki Kumar Yadav @ Vikki Kumar Yadav S/O Pramod Kumar Yadav
                 Resident of Village- Madrauni, P.S.- Rangra, District- Bhagalpur


                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   15-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Kursela P.S. Case No.282 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the

                   Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (in short

                   ‘NDPS’) Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short is that from

                   the bagpack of the petitioner, altogether 205.94 gm of smack

                   like contraband was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that the weight of the contraband
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14747 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026
                                            2/3




          which is alleged to be recovered from the possession of this

          petitioner is with polythene. It has further been submitted that

          the I.O. has recorded that the smack like contraband is

          hygroscopic material and its quantum may increase or

          decrease. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further

          submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police

          personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the

          BNSS. It has further been submitted that police have not

          followed Section 50 of the NDPS Act. It has further been

          submitted that though the alleged recovery of contraband is

          more than small quantity but is much less than commercial

          quantity. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further

          submitted that petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and

          he is in judicial custody since 12.12.2025.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned

          APP for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court

          is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14747 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      learned Principal Sessions Judge, Katihar in connection with

                      Kursela P.S. Case No.282 of 2025.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.