Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Ram @ Ajit Kumar @ AjitversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Ajay Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery (IPC section 392) alleged to have occurred on 9 July 2023, and has been in custody since 1 May 2025. He applied for bail, submitting an undertaking that he would not engage in any criminal activity and that the State could cancel bail if he violated the terms. The State opposed the bail on the ground of the petitioner’s criminal antecedents. The Court noted the prolonged pre‑trial detention and the likelihood that the trial would not conclude soon, and therefore decided to grant bail subject to strict conditions, including a cash bond, sureties, regular appearances before the trial court and police, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or committing further offences. The bail order was pronounced by Justice Rajiv Roy. The petitioner was released on bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties of equal amount, along with detailed compliance requirements.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case of robbery (IPC 392) given the prolonged pre‑trial custody and alleged criminal antecedents.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • robbery
  • IPC 392
  • pre‑trial detention
  • criminal antecedent
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1481 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2023 Thana- KADIRGANJ District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Ram @ Ajit Kumar @ Ajit S/o Lalan Ram R/o Village -
                 Chaiti Pipar, P.S - Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   03-04-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with

                   Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 88 of 2023 for the offence punishable

                   under sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on

                   09.07.2023 by the informant, Uttam Kumar.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that on 09.07.2023 while he alongwith his nephew were moving

                   on bicycles and as they tried to fix the chain of the bicycle, the

                   accused came and snatched the mobile phone on gun point. As

                   the registration plate was recorded, the F.I.R.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

                   has already suffered by being in custody since 01.05.2025, an

                   undertaking has been            given that if granted bail, shall not

                   indulge in any criminal activity and if he is found to be involved
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1481 of 2026(3) dt.03-04-2026
                                            2/3




          in any criminal case, the State can take steps for cancellation of

          bail bonds.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that he

          has criminal antecedent.

                       6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also

          the fact that he has remained in custody since 01.05.2025, the

          trial is not likely to be concluded, in that background, this Court

          is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail with conditions.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

          like amount each to the satisfaction of             learned A.C.J.M.,

          Masaurhi,        in connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 88 of

          2023 subject to the following conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Driving License/Voter ID/Pan Card

          etc.) to show his bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1481 of 2026(3) dt.03-04-2026
                                                         3/3




                       police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his

                       attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted

                       before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty

                       to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;

                                    (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                       promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                       failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                       cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                    (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                       criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                       to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                      (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.