Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kanchan Kumar @ Kanchan MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Kanchan Kumar, was implicated in a land‑dispute related assault case (P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. He allegedly struck the informant with a lathi causing a fracture, and other co‑accused assaulted the informant’s family. The petitioner pleaded innocence, arguing that the injury was not to a vital part, there was no intent to cause death, and that the dispute was primarily between the informant and another accused, not him. The State opposed his bail, maintaining the seriousness of the offences. The Court, considering the lack of serious injury to vital parts, the background of a land dispute, and the possibility of false implication, ordered bail on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and compliance with Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. and other conditions. The petitioner was directed to surrender within eight weeks and remain present for court dates.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the charges of assault and related offences under the B.N.S.
  • Whether the alleged injuries constitute a serious offence warranting denial of bail
  • Whether the background of a land dispute and possibility of false implication justify bail

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 117(2), 118, 118(2), 126(2), 3(5), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 74

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • land dispute
  • false implication
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Section 482
  • B.N.S.

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14844 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- KATHAIYA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Kanchan Kumar @ Kanchan Mahto Son of Bhagirath Mahto Resident of
                 Village - Patti Aswari, P.S.- Kathaiya, District - Muzaffarpur.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2.    In    the    present     case,     the    petitioner         is

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Kathaiya P.S. Case

                   No. 184 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections

                   126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 117(2), 118(2), 74, 352, 351(2),

                   351(3), 3(5) of B.N.S.

                                        3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner and

                   other co-accused persons, in the background of land dispute,

                   assaulted the informant with lathi, danda, iron rod, knife and

                   Dab. The allegation against the petitioner is that he gave a lathi

                   blow on the left hand and left leg of the informant causing its

                   fracture. The assailants also assaulted the wife and daughter of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14844 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026
                                            2/3




          the informant.

                            4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case. Only allegation against the petitioner is that he gave lathi

          blow on the leg and hand of the informant which are not vital

          parts, though the injuries are stated to be grievous due to

          fracture but there was no intention to cause death. Learned

          counsel further submits that the land dispute is admitted and

          parties are agnates. Even the land dispute is between the

          informant and co-accused Kundan and not with the petitioner.

          The petitioner is having clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioner.

                       6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          absence of any serious injury on any vital part and also

          considering the background of land dispute and possibility of

          false implication, let the petitioner above named, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a

          period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

          Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14844 of 2026(2) dt.03-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. (West), Muzaffarpur/concerned

                      court in connection with Kathaiya P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025,

                      subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                      the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions :

                                                      (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                                      relative of the petitioner.

                                                      (ii) The petitioner will remain present

                                                      on each and every date fixed by the

                                                      court below, if so required by the

                                                      learned trial court.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.