Patna High Court
Ranjana KumariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to conditions.
Summary
Ranjana Kumari, a school teacher, was implicated in a FIR (Daudpur P.S. Case No.267 of 2025) alleging that she forged a mark‑sheet and, in collusion with recruitment officials, secured a government teaching appointment, constituting offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the IPC. She applied for anticipatory bail, asserting her innocence, clean antecedent and that no departmental proceedings had been initiated against her. The State opposed the bail. The Court noted a similar case where Nilam Kumari, facing identical allegations, was granted anticipatory bail, and considered the petitioner’s spotless record. Accordingly, the Court granted anticipatory bail, directing her to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and to cooperate with the investigation, subject to verification of any concealed criminal antecedent under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite allegations of forgery and criminal conspiracy under the IPC.
- Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the precedent of a similar bail order justify granting anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482(2)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 120, 420, 467, 468, 471
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- forgery
- criminal conspiracy
- IPC
- clean antecedent
- teacher recruitment
- verification of antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14863 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2025 Thana- DAUDPUR District- Saran
======================================================
Ranjana Kumari D/o Abhay Bahadur Singh R/o Village - Sadhpur, P.S -
Daudpur, District - Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indu Bhushan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
3 29-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection
with Daudpur P.S. Case No.267 of 2025, registered for the
offence under Sections 420,467,468,471,120(B) of the I.P.C
3. Prosecution case in short is that, the informant
alleges that Panchayat teacher Ranjana Kumari acting in
collusion with the then-prevailing recruitment unit and other
unidentified individuals fabricated a mark-sheet; subsequently,
by utilizing this forged document as genuine, she fraudulently
secured employment through a criminal conspiracy to illegally
obtain an appointment. Accordingly, the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and she has
falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel appearing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14863 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026
2/3
on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is a lady of
clean antecedent and till date no departmental proceeding was
initiated against her. Learned counsel for the petitioner next
submits that one Nilam Kumari similarly situated as the
petitioner has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail vide
order dated 24.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.10729 of 2026.
5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail
application.
6. On the same allegation another FIR was lodged
bearing Rasulpur P.S. Case No.181 of 2025 in which the
accused was one Nilam Kumari. Even Nilam Kumari was
alleged to have obtained job of Government Teacher on the
basis of forged document. Similar allegation has also been
levelled against the petitioner of this case. Nilam Kumari
similarly situated as the petitioner has been granted privilege of
anticipatory bail vide order dated 24.02.2026 passed in Cr.
Misc. No.10729 of 2026.
7. Under these circumstances and also taking into
account the fact that the petitioner is a lady of clean antecedent
and till date no departmental proceeding has been initiated
against her, I am also inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory
bail to the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14863 of 2026(3) dt.29-04-2026
3/3
8. Accordingly, the petitioner above named, in the
event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below
within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on
anticipatory bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of
Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial
Magistrate, Ist Class, Saran, Chapra in connection with Daudpur
P.S. Case No.267 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down
under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
and with following conditions:
(i) the petitioner shall co-operate in the
investigation/trial.
(ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the
criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that
the petitioner has concealed her criminal antecedent, the Court
below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the
petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process
would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Prakash Narayan
U T
Checking your session…