Patna High Court
Ruksana Khatoon @ Rukhsana KhatunversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court held that bail should be granted, subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 and conditions ensuring trial cooperation and no tampering with evidence.
Summary
The petitioner, Ruksana Khatoon, was arrested on 24 January 2026 for possession of 8.640 litres of illicit liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. She applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and highlighting non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (Suppression) Act, 2023 in the investigation. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court considered the nature of the offence, the petitioner’s antecedents, and the procedural lapses, and ordered that bail be granted on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and specific conditions regarding trial cooperation, evidence tampering, and verification of antecedents. The order directed that the bail bond be accepted without delay for verification purposes.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to a person accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for possession of illicit liquor.
- Whether the alleged non‑compliance of Section 103 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (Suppression) Act, 2023 affects the grant of bail.
- Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent warrants bail.
Subjects
- bail
- illicit liquor
- excise law
- Section 30(a)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- BNSS 2023
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15009 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kishanganj
======================================================
Ruksana Khatoon @ Rukhsana Khatun W/o Md. Samim Resident of Hospital
Road, Ward no. 7, PS- Forbesganj, District- Araria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Choubey, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Renu Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 09-03-2026 Heard Mr.Ranjeet Choubey, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Ms.Renu Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
24.01.2026 in connection with Special Case No.91 of 2026
arising out of Kishanganj Excise P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026, F.I.R.
dated 24.01.2026 registered for the offence punishable under
Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act,
2018.
3. Recovery is of 8.640 liters of illicit liquor.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. It appears from
the FIR as well as the seizure list that altogether 8.640 liters of
illicit liquor was recovered from the Bag of the petitioner and
there is non-compliance of Section 103 of BNSS, 2023 and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15009 of 2026(2) dt.09-03-2026
2/3
petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2026.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner,
above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise-II,
Kishanganj in connection with Special Case No.91 of 2026
arising out of Kishanganj Excise P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026, with
the following conditions:-
(I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and
on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any
stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15009 of 2026(2) dt.09-03-2026
3/3
bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail
bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be
delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U T
Checking your session…