Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh VermaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

Mukesh Verma was arrested in connection with a violent assault case (Kauwakole P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025) involving multiple offences under sections 191(3), 189(4), 126(2), 115(2), 117(3), 118(2), 109, 305(9), 324(4), 76, 74, 114(4), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, inflicted injuries using iron rods, swords and other weapons, and also dragged a body outside a boundary wall. The petitioner had been in custody since 30‑04‑2025 and argued that the injuries were simple and he would cooperate with the trial. The State opposed bail, contending that the petitioner participated in repeated blows causing injuries. The Court, noting the simplicity of the injuries and the length of custody, decided to grant bail subject to strict conditions including surety, regular court appearances, police attendance, non‑interference with witnesses, and abstention from further offences. The bail bond was set at Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged.
  • Whether the simplicity of the injuries and the duration of pre‑trial custody justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • assault
  • simple injuries
  • pre‑trial detention
  • criminal procedure
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15051 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Mukesh Verma Son of Ashok Verma R/o Village - Jagochak, P.S. - Kawakole,
                 Dist. - Nawada.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv.
                                                 Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   24-04-2026                      Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel

                   for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, learned APP.

                                 2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with

                   Kauwakole P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025 for the offence

                   punishable under sections 191(3), 189(4), 126(2), 115(2),

                   117(3), 118(2), 109, 305(9), 324(4), 76, 74, 114(4), 352 and

                   351(3) of the BNS.

                                 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that the named accused persons alongwith unknown armed

                   variously entered the house and assaulted her husband and

                   family members. The allegation against Rizwan Khan is of

                   using sword to hit on the head of the informant's husband

                   whereas Afzal Khan and Shahwaz Khan beside Monu Khan
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15051 of 2026(3) dt.24-04-2026
                                            2/4




          gave iron rod blow to the brother-in-law Dilip Singh on the

          head. Further allegation is that Mohan Khan and Mukesh Verma

          (petitioner herein) gave iron rod blow on the hand, leg and head

          causing injuries. Further, Sohail Khan and Sohrab Khan

          assaulted the mother-in-law causing injury in the hand whereas

          Arbaz Khan and Saroj Khan beside Saurav Singh gave khanti

          blow to the informant as also other family members. Further

          allegation against this petitioner and Vikash Verma is of

          dragging the body outside the boundary wall. When the brother-

          in-law came to the rescue, Nitu Devi gave brick blow causing

          injuries. This led to the F.I.R.

                       4. Earlier, the case diary and the Trial Court Report

          were called for which are now part of the record and it shows

          that cognizance has been taken in the matter on 31.10.2025 and

          since Sohrab Khan absented himself, the case is waiting for his

          appearance for which summon has been issued.

                       4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits

          that allegation of assault is there against him along with Mohan

          Khan and the injuries have been found to be simple in nature, he

          has remained in custody since 30.04.2025 and if granted relief,

          shall be diligently appearing in trial/ failure to do so, appropriate

          steps can be taken for cancellation of bail bond.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15051 of 2026(3) dt.24-04-2026
                                            3/4




                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail submitting

          that along with Mohan Khan, he gave repeated blow causing

          injuries.

                       6. Considering the submissions of the parties

          aforesaid as also that it has been recorded that the injuries have

          been found to be simple in nature, he has remained in custody

          since 30.04.2025, this Court is inclined to extend him the

          privilege of bail with conditions.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties

          of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Chief

          Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Kauwakole

          P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

          police station every fortnight for six months to mark his
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15051 of 2026(3) dt.24-04-2026
                                                       4/4




                     attendance and at the end of the period, the certificate be

                     submitted to the Court;

                                  (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                     promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                     failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                     cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                  (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                     criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                     to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.