Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anand Thakur @ Nand ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and specified conditions.

Summary

Anand Thakur was arrested on 21 January 2026 for alleged possession of 135 litres of illicit Saufi Nepali country liquor, alleged to violate Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act (BNSS) and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act (Amendment) 2022. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was fabricated, and that the investigation failed to comply with Section 103 of the BNSS. The State opposed bail, noting two other pending cases, though the petitioner was already on bail in those matters. The High Court considered the facts, the nature of the offences, and the petitioner’s claim of innocence, and ordered that bail be granted on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and several conditions regarding trial cooperation, evidence tampering, and verification of criminal antecedents. The order directed that the bail bond be accepted without delay for verification purposes.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 274 and 275 of the BNSS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2022.
  • Whether the alleged non‑compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS warrants denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s pending criminal matters affect the grant of bail in the present case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • excise law
  • BNSS
  • Section 274
  • Section 275
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 103
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15111 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2026 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Anand Thakur @ Nand Thakur Son of Ramchandra Thakur @ Dukhi Thakur
                 R/o - Parsa, P.S - Basopatti, District - Madhubani Present Resident of Village-
                 Basopatti Purvi, Ps- Basopatti, Dist- Madhubani

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-03-2026                    Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   21.01.2026, in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 15 of

                   2026, F.I.R. dated 21.01.2026                registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 274 and 275 of the B.N.S. and

                   Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act

                   (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                                3. Recovery is of 135 litres of Saufi Nepali made

                   country liquor.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15111 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026
                                            2/3




          present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in

          the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not

          committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It appears from

          the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that altogether 135 litres of Saufi

          Nepali-made country liquor was recovered from the possession

          of the petitioner.          He further submits that there is non-

          compliance of Section 103 of BNSS, 2023 and the petitioner is

          in custody since 21.01.2026.

                       5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State has vehemently opposed the prayer for              bail of the

          petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries two more cases

          other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of

          paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in

          the pending matters.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

          case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned     Exclusive Special Judge Excise Act, Madhubani in

          connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 15 of 2026, subject to

          the following conditions :-

                       (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15111 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (3) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.             However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.