Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. AfsarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Afsar, was arrested on 30 July 2025 in connection with a theft case (PS Sohsarai Case No. 318 of 2024) alleged under Sections 331(4) and 305(B) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The FIR does not name him; his alleged involvement emerged only from a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no other material evidence, no TIP, and no recovery from his possession. The State opposed bail, highlighting that the petitioner has fourteen other criminal cases, though he is on bail in twelve of them. The Court noted the lack of direct evidence, the petitioner’s non‑naming in the FIR, and the absence of investigative steps, and therefore ordered his release on bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and several conditions regarding cooperation, non‑tampering, and verification of antecedents. The bail order was directed to be implemented by the Judicial Magistrate of Nalanda without delay for verification.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted when the accused is not named in the FIR and the only incriminating material is a co‑accused’s confessional statement.
  • Whether the existence of multiple pending criminal cases affects the grant of bail in the present case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • FIR
  • confessional statement
  • co‑accused
  • no material evidence
  • Section 331
  • Section 305
  • Bihar High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15145 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2024 Thana- SOHSARAI District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Afsar S/o Md. Iqram Resident of Mohalla - Sabzibagh (Darzi Tola), P.S-
                 Pirbahore, Distt.- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr. Amir Alam, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-03-2026                      Heard Mr. Amir Alam, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Lalan Kumar, learned APP for the State.

                                 2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   30.07.2025, in connection with Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 318 of

                   2024, F.I.R. dated 23.12.2024 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305(B) of the B.N.S.

                                 3. The F.I.R. of the occurrence of theft is against

                   unknown.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the

                   petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis

                   of confessional statement of co-accused person, namely, Md.

                   Samir @ Sanni and except the aforesaid, no other cogent

                   material has come during investigation to suggest the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15145 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026
                                            2/3




          involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence and till

          date no TIP was conducted by the prosecution and nothing has

          been recovered from the conscious possession or the house of

          the petitioner and petitioner has been remanded in the present

          case from Barh P.S. Case No. 949 of 2024 and he is custody in

          the present case since 30.07.2025.

                       5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State has vehemently opposed the prayer for            bail of the

          petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries fourteen more

          cases other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis

          of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that out of fourteen cases, the

          petitioner is on bail in twelve cases.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and the fact that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the

          name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of

          confessional statement of co-accused person and till date no TIP

          was conducted by the prosecution, let the petitioner, above

          named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate

          1st Class/concerned Court, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection

          with Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 318 of 2024, subject to the
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15145 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         following conditions :-

                                      (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (3) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.             However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.