Patna High Court
Birendra Yadav @ Virendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The court granted permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
Birendra Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking permission to withdraw it while retaining the right to raise all points later at the charge‑framing stage. The petitioner’s counsel requested the court’s approval for this withdrawal. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the permission sought. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The court expressly noted that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying case.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal miscellaneous application may be withdrawn with liberty to raise the same points at the charge‑framing stage
Subjects
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal of application
- charge framing
- miscellaneous application
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1517 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2025 Thana- KOPA District- Saran
======================================================
Birendra Yadav @ Virendra Yadav S/o- Vakil Yadav R/v- Bhatwaliya Ps-
Kopa Dist- Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Bihar
2. Urmila Kunwar W/o- Late Hardeo Yadav R/v- Bhatwaliya Ps- Kopa Dist-
Saran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 11-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this criminal
miscellaneous application with liberty to raise all the points as
raised in this application, at the time of framing of charge, if not
framed.
3. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed
any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
brajesh/-
U T
Checking your session…