Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. RafiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court extended the surrender period by two weeks and ordered confirmation of the provisional bail upon verification of the payment, subject to the parties withdrawing all other cases and effecting a divorce.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Rafi, sought confirmation of a provisional bail that had been granted on 11‑08‑2025 but could not be secured because the required bail bond of Rs.5,00,000 was not paid at that time. The petitioner later paid the full amount of Rs.15,00,000 into the account of the opposite party via RTGS. The court extended the surrender period by two weeks from receipt of the order, directing that a notice be issued to the opposite party to appear within two weeks, and that if the opposite party does not appear but the payment is verified, the provisional bail would be confirmed. The court also reiterated its earlier direction that the parties must take steps to withdraw all pending cases against each other and obtain a divorce. The application for confirmation of bail was disposed with these directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the surrender period for the petitioner can be extended for confirming provisional bail after payment of the bail bond
  • Whether the court can confirm provisional bail upon verification of payment despite the opposite party's non‑appearance

Subjects

  • provisional bail
  • bail bond
  • surrender period
  • extension of bail
  • family dispute
  • withdrawal of cases
  • divorce

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15173 of 2026
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89892 of 2024
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1335 Year-2023 Thana- SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                         Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Rafi S/o Chand Ahmad Resident of Village- Bairiya, P.S.- Muzaffarpur,
                 District- Muzaffarpur
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr.Smita Shreeyash
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. Let the defect(s) as pointed out by the office be

                   ignored.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the provisional bail had been granted to the petitioner vide

                   order dated 11.08.2025 but the bail bonds could not be furnished

                   as the required amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- could not be paid on

                   that point of time. However, it has been submitted that the entire

                   amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- is now paid in the account of the

                   opposite party no. 2 through RTGS which would be evident

                   from Annexure-2.

                                4. Considering the above-mentioned submissions, the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15173 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       period for surrender granted to the petitioner for seeking

                       provisional bail vide order dated 11.08.2025 is extended by

                       another two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy

                       of this order whereafter, the learned court concerned would

                       issue notice to the opposite party no. 2 seeking her appearance

                       within a period of two weeks and even in case of non-

                       appearance, if the court concerned is satisfied with the factum of

                       payment being made into her account, the court would proceed

                       to confirm the provisional bail granted to the petitioner.

                       However, it goes without saying that the observation with regard

                       to taking effective steps to get all the cases withdrawn/dismissed

                       against each other and also get the divorce effected between the

                       parties as observed in paragraph -6 of the order dated

                       11.08.2025 would, however, remain intact.

                                    5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this

                       application is disposed of.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.