Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ekbal Ali @ Ekbal Ahmad @ IqbalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed the bail application, granting regular bail to the petitioner with conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Ekbal Ali, was arrested in connection with a fight on 21 September 2025 that resulted in the death of Faisal Ahmed. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, stabbed the deceased with intent to kill, invoking Sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The petitioner’s counsel argued that he was falsely implicated, citing witness statements that a person in a red T‑shirt, not the petitioner, inflicted the fatal wound, and highlighted the post‑mortem findings. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence and the petitioner’s three prior criminal antecedents. After considering the evidence and the petitioner’s willingness to cooperate, the court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of appearance and non‑tampering with evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of murder under Sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the evidence presented by the prosecution sufficiently justifies denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • murder
  • Sections 103(2) B.N.S.
  • Sections 61(2) B.N.S.
  • criminal procedure
  • evidence
  • witness statements

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15259 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2025 Thana- SRIPUR District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Ekbal Ali @ Ekbal Ahmad @ Iqbal Son of Abrar Ali @ Mohamad Abrar
                 Husain Resident of Village - Algatpur, P.S.- Sripur (Shripur), (Phulwariya),
                 District- Gopalganj

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Umanath Mishra, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   23-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Sripur P.S. Case No. 229

                   of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   103(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, it has been alleged that

                   on 21.09.2025, a fight occurred between two groups.

                   Consequently, few boys were roaming around the public

                   markets looking for the Gopalpur boys. It has been alleged that

                   around 3:30 p.m., the informant son, namely, Faisal Ahmed

                   went to Janta Bazar with his friend where one Amiruddin and

                   Asif got identified Faisal from Gopalpur to other boys. It is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15259 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026
                                            2/4




          alleged that Saif, Mudassir, Rehan, Mehboob, Iqbal(petitioner),

          Yusuf, Adil, Kamran, and Sajid then attacked Faisal. It has been

          specifically alleged that Saif, Mudassir, Mehboob and Iqbal

          (petitioner) with intention to kill stabbed Faisal, efforts were

          taken to take him to the hospital but before reaching to the

          hospital Faisal died. It has been alleged that the occurrence took

          place in front of the tea stall one by Imran.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

          this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

          the statement of tea shop owner Md. Imran has been recorded in

          para 5 of the case diary and he has stated that during the

          intervening fight between the two groups one person wearing a

          red t-shirt stabbed the deceased, thereafter, other persons fled

          away from there. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also

          drawn the intention of this court to the statement of witness

          Wasim Raja as recorded in paragraph 13 of the case diary in

          which he has stated that during the intervening fights, co-

          accused Saif Ali assaulted by means of knife on shoulder and

          abdomen of Faisal. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also

          drawn the attention of this court to the post mortem report

          wherein the autopsy surgeon has opined two injuries one on left
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15259 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026
                                            3/4




          scapula and one on intestine, on the person of deceased Faisal

          which corroborates the statement of the witness namely, Imran

          the tea shop owner as well as the statement of Wasim Raja as

          recorded in para 31. It has further been submitted that charge-

          sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no allegation of

          tampering and petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the trial. It

          has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has three criminal

          antecedents and he is in custody since 07.10.2025.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the

          parties and taking into account the facts and circumstance of the

          case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on

          furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned Court concerned, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-

          XIV, Gopalganj in connection with Sripur P.S. Case No. 229 of

          2025.

                       7. The petitioner is directed to co-operate in the trial

          and be well represented on each and every date fixed in the trial

          and failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below

          would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15259 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026
                                                         4/4




                                    8. It is further directed that petitioner would not

                       tamper with the evidence and if such allegations are made and if

                       the petitioner indulges himself in tampering of the evidence, the

                       prosecution will be at liberty to file appropriate application for

                       cancellation of bail bonds.

                                    9. The application stands allowed.



                                                  (Praveen Kumar, J)
niku/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.