Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sonam Devi @ Sonam KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of the same amount.

Summary

The petitioner, Sonam Devi, mother of a deceased child, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 103 of the BNS for allegedly killing her child. The prosecution's informant, the child's father, alleged that the petitioner had previously killed the child. The petitioner had been in custody since 26 May 2025. The court, noting the petitioner’s status as the mother and the length of her custody, allowed the bail application. She was ordered to be released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, with the court clarifying that this order is limited to bail and does not prejudice the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused mother under Section 103 of the BNS considering the nature of the alleged offence and period of custody.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 103
  • BNS
  • murder
  • custody
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.154 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- CHAND District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Sonam Devi @ Sonam Kumari Son of Suryadip Kumar R/o Village - Kuddi,
                 PO - Kuddi, PS - Chand, District - Kaimur(Bhabhua), State - Bihar.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Tarkeshwar Tiwary
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   09-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Chand P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   under Section 103 of the BNS.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the informant of

                   this case is the father of the deceased who has alleged that the

                   mother of the deceased has killed him. He further alleges that

                   earlier also, the petitioner has killed the child.

                                   4. The petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2025.

                                   5. Considering fact that the petitioner is the mother

                   of the deceased and her period of custody, this application is

                   allowed.

                                    6. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.154 of 2026(5) dt.09-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

                    with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                    the concerned Court below in connection with Chand P.S. Case

                    No. 134 of 2025.

                                    7. It is, however, clarified that the observations

                    made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                    application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                    any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not

                    expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.