Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court denied regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Chikku Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, alleging damage to CCTV cameras, vandalism, threatening an informant's mother at gunpoint, and extortion of Rs.5 lakh with a forced seizure of Rs.15,000. The petitioner, who had been in custody since December 10, 2025, applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and pointing to the fact that a co‑accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed the bail, highlighting the petitioner’s eleven prior criminal convictions and the seriousness of the alleged offences. The Court considered the gravity of the charges and the petitioner’s criminal antecedents and concluded that these factors outweighed the bail considerations. Consequently, the Court rejected the petitioner's application for regular bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner given the seriousness of the offences and his prior criminal antecedents.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal antecedents
  • extortion
  • threat at gunpoint
  • vandalism
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15483 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2025 Thana- NOWKOTHI GARHPURA District-
                                                         Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Chikku Kumar Son of Ramesh Singh @ Golki Singh Resident of Village-
                 Babhanganma, ward no. 12, Babhanganwan, P.S.- Nowkothi, (Nawkothi),
                 District- Begusarai

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Binod Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-03-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Nawkothi (Nowkothi) P.S. Case No. 147 of 2025 registered for

                   the offence under Sections 329(4), 308(5), 324(4), 61(2), 74,

                   351(2), 352, & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner, along

                   with other co-accused persons, allegedly damaged CCTV

                   cameras, vandalized property, threatened the informant’s mother

                   at gunpoint, and demanded extortion (Rangdari) of Rs. 5 lakh,

                   and Rs. 15,000/- was forcibly taken from the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15483 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      Petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2025. He further submits

                      that one of the co-accused has already been granted regular bail

                      by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                      opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the petitioner

                      has 11 criminal antecedents.

                                   6. Considering the seriousness of the allegations and

                      the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not

                      inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner even though one

                      of the co-accused has been granted bail.

                                   7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

                      rejected.



                                                 (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.