Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Amzad Khan @ Amjad KhanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court held that bail could not be granted due to the gravity of the offences and the ongoing trial.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Amzad Khan, sought regular bail for a case registered under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code concerning the alleged killing of a truck driver and looting of the truck. This was his third attempt for bail after two earlier applications were rejected. The prosecution’s case highlighted the seriousness of the offences, emphasizing the gravity of murder and related offences. The Court examined the trial witnesses and considered that the trial was ongoing, indicating a risk to the administration of justice if bail were granted. Given the nature of the allegations and the seriousness of the crimes, the Court was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a case involving offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • IPC
  • regular bail
  • gravity of offence
  • trial

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15592 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2023 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Amzad Khan @ Amjad Khan son of Late Irshad Khan Resident of
                 village- E-Block, Sector 2/600, Block Sector/E Sector Sector-4, Bhulinagar,
                 Dhanbad (jharkhand)

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.
                                                  Mr.Santosh Chandra Bhaskar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. This is the third attempt of the petitioner for grant

                   of regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 825 of 2025 arising

                   out of Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 125 of 2023 registered for the

                   offence under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                 3. Earlier the bail applications of the petitioner were

                   rejected vide orders dated 24.01.2024 and 4.4.2025 passed in Cr.

                   Misc. No. 2859 of 2024 and Cr. Misc. No. 60923 of 2024

                   respectively. The order dated 4.4.2025 reads as under:-

                                                Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
                                    and learned APP for the State Shri Jharkhandi
                                    Upadhyay.
                                                2. Seen the report of the Superintendent
                                    of Police, Rohtas.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15592 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                                                 3. This is the second attempt of the
                                    petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection
                                    with Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 125 of 2023
                                    registered for the offence under Section 302, 201 of
                                    the Indian Penal Code.
                                                 4. As per the prosecution case, the
                                    petitioner is involved in the killing of the truck
                                    driver and looting the truck.
                                                 5. Considering the nature of allegation
                                    levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not
                                    inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
                                                 6.    Accordingly,      this   application   is
                                    dismissed.
                                 4. In the trial, witnesses are being examined.

                                 5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact

                    that the trial is going on, this Court is not inclined to grant bail

                    to the petitioner.

                                 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.



                                                               (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.