Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan PalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The application is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Chandan Pal and Basdeo Pal, filed a criminal miscellaneous application challenging the framing of charges in a case arising from Chainpur, Kaimur. Their counsel, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mishra, submitted that the charges had already been framed and sought to withdraw the application, reserving the right to raise any points at a later stage. The Court considered the request and, without expressing any opinion on the merits, allowed the prayer to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioners to raise any issues later. No substantive merits of the underlying criminal case were addressed by the Court.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural order
  • charges framed

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15790 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2023 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
           1.     Chandan Pal S/O Basudeo Pal @ Basudeo Pal R/V - Karji, P.S- Chainpur,
                  Dist.- Kaimur
           2.    Basdeo Pal @ Basudeo Pal S/O Late Munni Lal Pal R/V - Karji, P.S-
                 Chainpur, Dist.- Kaimur
                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                             Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.     Vimal Kumari D/o Surendra Pal R/o vill - Karji, P.S.- Chainpur, Distt.-
                  Kaimur
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mishra
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Raj Kishor Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-03-2026                  At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners

                   very fairly submits that charges have been framed in this case

                   and as such he intends to withdraw this application with a

                   liberty to raise all the points available to him and also the

                   grounds taken in this application at the appropriate stage.

                                2. Prayer is allowed.

                                3. Accordingly, this application is disposed of as

                   withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

                                4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed

                   any opinion on the merits of this case.



                                              (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.