Patna High Court
Afroz AlamversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a Rs.30,000 bail bond and compliance with Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
Summary
The petitioner, Afroz Alam, feared arrest in a case involving 1.25 litres of illicit liquor seized under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He claimed innocence, stating that nothing was recovered from his possession, he was not named in the FIR, and he has a clean criminal record. The State opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The Court considered the facts and, applying the provisions of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling (BNSS) Act, 2023, granted anticipatory bail on the condition of furnishing a Rs.30,000 bail bond and compliance with Section 482(2) of the BNSS Act. The Court also directed the trial court to verify the petitioner’s criminal antecedent and cancel the bail if any concealment is discovered, but ordered that the bail bond should not be delayed pending verification.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the BNSS, 2023 in a case arising under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling (BNSS) Act, 2023 — s. 2(1)(d), 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a), 32(3)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illicit liquor
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- BNSS Act
- Section 482
- criminal procedure
- bail bond
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15790 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kishanganj
======================================================
Afroz Alam S/o Mazebul Alam R/o Village - Motihara, Belwa ward No. 11,
P.S - Kishanganj, District - Kishanganj
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 25-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection
with Special Case No. 96 of 2024, arising out of Madya Nisedh
P.S. Case No. 93 of 2024, dated 24.01.2024, lodged under
Sections 30(a) & 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise
(Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. As per the prosecution, total recovery of 1.25 litres
of illicit liquor has been made, which is the subject matter of the
present case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further
submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of
the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is not
named in the FIR. Furthermore, he submits that the criminal
antecedent of the petitioner is clean.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15790 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
2/2
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of
this case, let the above named petitioner be released on
anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the
Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as
mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the
satisfaction of Exclusive Special Excise Judge, II, Kishanganj,
in connection with Special Case No. 96 of 2024, arising out of
Madya Nisedh P.S. Case No. 93 of 2024, subject to the
conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
7. It is further directed that the Trial Court shall verify
the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, and in case it is found
at any stage that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
antecedent, the Trial Court shall take steps for cancellation of
the petitioner’s bail bond. However, the acceptance of the bail
bond in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed
for the purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.