Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rampari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, a group of family members from Chhatauna village, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with PS Samastipur Muffasil Case No. 410 of 2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The application was filed on 6 October 2025 based on an FIR lodged by informant Priyanka Kumari. Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, later moved that the petition be withdrawn. The Court, after hearing on 11 March 2026, accepted the withdrawal and consequently dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the bail application were considered, and the case stands pending the regular trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code in view of the alleged offences under the B.N.S.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 303(2), 329(4), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 76

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal procedure
  • B.N.S. sections
  • arrest apprehension

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15853 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-410 Year-2025 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL District-
                                                        Samastipur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Rampari Devi Wife of Subodh Mahto Residents of Village- Chhatauna, P.S-
                  Muffassil, District-Samastipur.
           2.    Subodh Mahto Son of Late Rambilash Mahto Residents of Village-
                 Chhatauna, P.S- Muffassil, District-Samastipur.
           3.    Niraj Mahto Son of Subodh Mahto Residents of Village- Chhatauna, P.S-
                 Muffassil, District-Samastipur.
           4.    Hajari Mahto @ Ravishankar Kumar S/O Deepak Mahto Residents of
                 Village- Chhatauna, P.S- Muffassil, District-Samastipur.
           5.    Kalpana Devi Wife of Niraj Mahto Residents of Village- Chhatauna, P.S-
                 Muffassil, District-Samastipur.
           6.    Vibha Devi @ Bibha Devi Wife of Deepak Mahto Residents of Village-
                 Chhatauna, P.S- Muffassil, District-Samastipur.


                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP
                 For the Informant       :       Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   11-03-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 410 of 2025

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 76, 118(1), 109(1), 117(2), 303(2), 329(4), 351(2), 352

                   and 3(5) of the B.N.S., lodged on 06.10.2025 by the informant

                   Priyanka Kumari.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15853 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   3. Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, learned counsel for the

                      petitioners pray for withdrawal of the petition.

                                   4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application

                      stands rejected as withdrawn.



                                                     (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.