Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RAUSHAN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Since the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. did not allege any offence by the petitioner, anticipatory bail was granted.

Summary

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 194 of 2025 alleging an offence under Sections 96 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, wherein he was accused of enticing a girl for marriage. The victim was later recovered and gave a statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., in which she made no allegation against the petitioner. The State opposed bail but acknowledged the victim’s statement. The court noted that the victim’s statement did not implicate the petitioner and that the pending case and prior FIR did not preclude bail. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.30,000 and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail is warranted when the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. does not allege any wrongdoing by the accused.
  • Whether the existence of a pending criminal case and a prior FIR against the petitioner affect the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • section 183
  • victim statement
  • criminal antecedent
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15913 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2025 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
                 RAUSHAN KUMAR S/O MANOHAR MAHTO R/o vill - Saraiya, P.S.-
                 Chautham, Distt.- Khagaria

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rakesh Mohan Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, A.P.P
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025 lodged on 01.07.2025,

                   for the offence punishable under Sections 96 & 3(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   five named accused persons including the present petitioner

                   alleging that he along with other accused persons have enticed

                   the informant’s daughter with a view to marry.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15913 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          submits that the alleged victim has been recovered and after

          recovery, she has narrated her statement before the Magistrate

          under section 183 of the B.N.S.S, in which, she has not made

          any allegation against anyone. Counsel submits that the

          statement under section 183 of the B.N.S.S has been

          acknowledged in the rejection order. He submits that the

          criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean as there is one

          case pending against him in which he is on bail. Counsel

          submits that with same allegation, another FIR has been lodged

          against the petitioner bearing Beldaur P.S. Case No. 253 of

          2025.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner but fairly submits that in the rejection

          order, it has come that the victim’s statement has been recorded

          under section 183 of the B.N.S.S, in which she has not made

          any allegation against anyone including the petitioner.

                       6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of

          this case, let the above named petitioner be released on

          anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as

          mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15913 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                         3/3




                       satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in

                       connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 194 of 2025, subject to

                       the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.



                                                                       (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.