Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rinku NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Rinku Noniya was arrested in connection with the recovery of 25 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a bush behind his house, alleged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, arguing that the liquor was not in his possession, that the seizure was made in an open area, and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. during the seizure. The State opposed bail, citing a prior similar offence. The Court, after hearing both sides, considered the lack of direct possession, procedural lapses in seizure, and the petitioner’s custodial status since January, and decided to grant regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The bail order was directed to be executed by the District and Additional Sessions Judge‑cumm‑Exclusive Special Excise Court‑II, Kaithar.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the alleged non‑compliance with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. during seizure warrants bail.
  • Impact of the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent on the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 105 compliance
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16068 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2026 Thana- BARSOI District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Rinku Noniya, S/O Late Yuvraj Noniya Resident of village - Naya Tola
                 Baltar, Police Station- Barsoi, District- Katihar

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Nand Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   20-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from

                   the bush behind the house of this petitioner, altogether 25 liters

                   of illicit country made liquor was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession rather the

                   recovery is from an open place. He has no concerned with

                   alleged liquor. It has further been submitted that the witnesses of
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16068 of 2026(3) dt.20-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       seizure list are police personnel. Police has not complied

                       Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. Petitioner

                       is languishing in judicial custody since 06.01.2026.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted

                       that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case of

                       similar nature.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District

                       and Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Excise

                       Court-II, Kaithar in connection with Barsoi P.S. Case No.02 of

                       2026.


                                                        (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.