Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shambhu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court held that regular bail could not be granted to the petitioner.

Summary

Shambhu Singh applied for regular bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Sections 8, 20 and 21(c) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that a large quantity of contraband – 66 bottles of Corex cough syrup, 4 bottles of Nepali Saufi, 750 grams of ganja and two unregistered motorcycles – was recovered from the petitioner’s residence. The petitioner claimed innocence and had been in custody since 13 October 2025. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences and the volume of seized narcotics. The Court, after considering the gravity of the offences, declined to grant regular bail, stating that the observation was prima facie and would not affect the trial. The bail application was therefore rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the NDPS Act given the seriousness of the alleged offences and the quantity of contraband seized.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • drug trafficking
  • contraband seizure
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1609 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-703 Year-2025 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Shambhu Singh S/O Late Laxmi Singh Resident of village -Bariyarpur, Ward
                 No.- 37, P.S- Sitamarhi,Dist- Sitamarhi

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate
                                                   Mr. Dwij Raj
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   30-03-2026                   Heard the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner

                   and learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 703 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and

                   Sections 8, 20, 21(c) of the NDPS Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, 66 bottles of

                   contraband Corex cough syrup, each of 100 ml (totaling 6.6

                   litres), 4 bottles of Nepali Saufi, each of 300 ml (totaling 1.2

                   litres), and 750 grams of Ganja were recovered. Two

                   motorcycles without valid papers were also recovered from the

                   house of the petitioner.

                                 4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1609 of 2026(4) dt.30-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any

                      offence. Petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2025.

                                   5. Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes

                      the bail application and submits that the allegations against the

                      petitioner are serious and grave in nature.

                                   6. Considering the gravity of the offences and the

                      quantity of contraband recovered, this Court is not inclined to

                      grant regular bail to the petitioner.

                                   7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

                      rejected.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.