Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and verification of the petitioner’s antecedent.

Summary

Nitish Kumar sought relief from arrest in a 2018 case alleging violations of the Arms Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. The prosecution alleged that two unidentified individuals were found on a motorcycle, bearing illegal weapons, which was registered in the petitioner’s name. The petitioner contended he was not present at the scene, maintained his innocence, and asserted a clean criminal record. The High Court, noting the petitioner was not caught on the motorcycle, allowed the bail application, directing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and a verification of his antecedent before final acceptance. The Court clarified that its order was limited to bail and did not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the circumstances of the alleged offence under the Arms Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the fact that he was not found on the motorcycle justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • illegal weapons
  • antecedent verification
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16196 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-613 Year-2018 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Nitish Kumar Son of Ram Swarath Mahto Resident of village- Gosai Tola, Ps-
                 Patliputra, Dist- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Indeshwari Prasad Mandal
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2.         The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 613 of 2018 registered

                   for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act

                   and under Section 37(B) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   (Amendment) Act, 2018.

                                   3.    As per the prosecution case, two unknown

                   criminal were found on the motorcycle with illegal weapons and

                   the motorcycle was found to be that of the petitioner.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is innocent and was not caught on the spot. He

                   further submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16196 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                                    5. Considering the fact that the petitioner was not

                    found on the motorcycle, this application is allowed.

                                     6. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

                    his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today be released

                    on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

                    with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                    the learned concerned Court below in connection with Patliputra

                    P.S. Case No. 613 of 2018.

                                    7. As the petitioner claims to have clean

                    antecedent, the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of

                    the petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the

                    petitioner. If the petitioner is found to be involved in any other

                    case then the bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted.

                                    8. It is, however, clarified that the observations

                    made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                    application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                    any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not

                    expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                               (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.