Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aramod Sahani @ Armod ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The modification application is allowed, directing acceptance of the bail bond and extending the surrender period by two weeks.

Summary

The petitioner, Aramod Sahani, was involved in a criminal miscellaneous case (No.16208 of 2026) arising from PS case No.281 of 2024. He had been required to surrender and furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000, which he deposited with the Ramkrishna Mission Sevashrama in Muzaffarpur. The petitioner applied for a modification of the earlier bail order dated 22.12.2025, seeking acceptance of the bail bond and an extension of the surrender period. The court examined the application, the deposit of the bail amount, and the petitioner’s submissions. It held that the bail bond could be accepted and the surrender deadline extended by two weeks from the date of the order. Consequently, the modification application was allowed, directing the lower court to accept the bail bond and grant the extension.

Issues considered

  • Whether the bail bond deposited by the petitioner should be accepted by the court
  • Whether the time granted for surrender can be extended

Subjects

  • bail
  • modification of bail order
  • criminal miscellaneous case
  • surrender deadline
  • High Court of Patna

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16208 of 2026
                                               In
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88749 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2024 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Aramod Sahani @ Armod Chaudhari S/O Megha Sahani R/O Village-
                  Hathiyahi, P.S- Piprakothi, Distt.- East Champaran.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sumit Kumar Gupta, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    10-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                 2. For the reasons stated in the application and the

                    submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the

                    fact that since the amount of Rs. 10,000/- has been deposited in the

                    Ramkrishna Mission Sevashrama, Swami Vivekananda Path, Bela,

                    Muzaffarpur by the petitioner, the order dated 22.12.2025 passed

                    in Cr. Misc. No. 88749 of 2025 is modified and the court below is

                    directed to accept the bail bonds of the petitioner and the time

                    granted for surrender is extended by further two weeks from today.

                                 3. The modification application stands allowed.


                                               (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.