Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kanhaiya YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioners are entitled to bail as the injuries are non‑serious, no intention to cause death is established, and the allegations do not preclude the grant of bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The Patna High Court heard two criminal miscellaneous petitions arising from the same police case (Govindganj PS Case No.50 of 2024) in which the petitioners were alleged to have participated in an unlawful assembly, assaulted an informant and his family, and caused grievous injuries. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated, that the incident was a mutual fight without intent to cause death, and that the injuries were not serious enough to warrant denial of bail. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the non‑serious nature of the injuries, lack of proven intent to cause death under Section 307 IPC, and the petitioners’ bail history, the Court ordered that the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and complying with conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order also required the petitioners to appear before the trial court as directed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail despite allegations under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 379 and 307 IPC.
  • Whether the injuries sustained by the informant constitute grievous hurt warranting denial of bail.
  • Whether there is sufficient evidence of intention to cause death to sustain a charge under Section 307 IPC.
  • Whether the petitioners were falsely implicated and the case is a counter‑blasting of an earlier FIR.

Legislation cited

  • Indian Penal Code — s. 147, 148, 149, 307, 308, 323, 324, 325, 341, 354(B), 379, 380, 447, 504

Subjects

  • bail
  • unlawful assembly
  • assault
  • IPC
  • Section 307
  • intention to cause death
  • counter FIR
  • land dispute
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16324 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2024 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Kanhaiya Yadav S/o Ram Awatar Yadav R/o Village - Jitwarpur, P.S -
                  Gobindganj, District - East Champaran
           2.    Rajanti Devi @ Rajayanti Devi W/o Yogendra Yadav R/o Village -
                 Jitwarpur, P.S - Gobindganj, District - East Champaran
           3.    Meena Devi W/o Rajendra Yadav R/o Village - Jitwarpur, P.S - Gobindganj,
                 District - East Champaran
           4.    Santlal Yadav @ Om Prakash Yadav S/o Late Dhup Yadav R/o Village -
                 Jitwarpur, P.S - Gobindganj, District - East Champaran
           5.    Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Yadav S/o Rajendra Yadav R/o Village - Jitwarpur,
                 P.S - Gobindganj, District - East Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                        with
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18350 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2024 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Yogendra Yadav S/O Late Dhrup Yadav @ Dhruv Yadav R/O Village-
                 Jitwarpur, P.S- Gobindganj, Distt.- East Champaran.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 16324 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                                            Ms. Harsha Shashwat, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18350 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                                            Ms. Harsha Shashwat, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-04-2026                 Both the cases arise from the same P.S. case, as such,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16324 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                            2/5




          both the matters are taken up together and are disposed of vide a

          common order.

                       02. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

          learned A.P.P. for the State.

                       03. In the          present     case,   the   petitioners   are

          apprehending their arrest in connection with Govindganj P.S.

          Case No.50 of 2024 registered for the alleged offences under

          Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 307 of the

          Indian Penal Code.

                       04. As per prosecution case, petitioners and other

          coaccused persons making an unlawful assembly and variously

          armed surrounded the informant. Petitioner Yogendra Yadav

          gave a farsa blow on his head and other coaccused Dilip Yadav

          and Ashok Yadav snatched Rs. 10,000/- from him and assaulted

          him with rod. Thereafter, coaccused Guddu Yadav and Rupesh

          Yadav assaulted him on his leg causing fracture on his right

          foot. The family members of the informant were also assaulted

          and their household articles were damaged. The occurrence took

          place in the background of the fact that the brother of the

          informant had earlier lodged Govindganj P.S. Case No. 132 of

          2023 against the petitioners.

                       05. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16324 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                            3/5




          the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

          this case. The present case is counter blast of Govindganj P.S.

          Case No. 46 of 2024 which has been registered for the offences

          under Sections 148, 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 308, 447, 307,

          380, 504, 354(B) of the IPC. One Vinay Yadav sexually

          assaulted the minor daugther of the petitioner Sant Lal Yadav

          and when the petitioner side took up this matter with his family,

          they assaulted the petitioners causing a number of injuries to

          them. Learned counsel further submits that in any case, the

          occurrence could be taken as a free fight between two groups

          and there was no intention to cause death. Learned counsel

          further submits that moreover there is specific allegation against

          petitioners of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 16324 of 2026 and

          allegation of assault is specific against petitioner Yogendra

          Yadav of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 18350 of 2026 but the

          said injury is not supported by the injury report as no sharp cut

          injury has been found on the informant and the injury on the

          informant is a lacerated one of size 4”x1/2” in frontoparietal

          region apart from pain in right limb. Though fracture of base of

          metatarsal bones and fracture of base of proximal phalanx has

          been observed and these injuries are stated to be grievous.

          Learned counsel further submits that there is also land dispute
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16324 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                            4/5




          between the parties and dispute over right to way. Learned

          counsel reiterates that there was no intention to cause death and

          no offence under Section 307 of the IPC is made out against the

          petitioners. Petitioner Rajanti Devi, Santlal Yadav and Ashok

          Kumar @ Ashok Yadav are having antecendent of one case each

          and petitioner Yogendra Yadav has antecedent of two cases.

          They are on bail in all the cases. Petitioner Kanhaiya Yadav and

          Meena Devi have no criminal antecedent.

                       06. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the

          submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the

          petitioners.

                       07. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          earlier counter version of the petitioners side and further

          considering the non-serious nature of injuries, let the petitioners

          above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the

          court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be

          released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of ACJM-Ist,

          Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Govindganj P.S.

          Case No.50 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16324 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026
                                                         5/5




                       Section 482(2) of the BNSS and other following conditions:

                                                       (i) One of the bailors will be a

                                                       close relative of the petitioners.

                                                       (ii) The petitioners will remain

                                                       present on each and every date

                                                       fixed by the court below, if so

                                                       required by the learned trial

                                                       court.



                                                 (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
anuradha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.