Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Prince Kumar was arrested on 25 May 2024 in connection with a 2021 FIR alleging dowry demand and related offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Witchcraft (Prevention) Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner pleaded innocence, claiming the allegations were fabricated and that he never demanded dowry from his wife, Pinki Devi. The State opposed bail, noting the petitioner’s involvement in another pending case, but conceded that he was already on bail in that matter. The Court examined the facts, the length of custody, and the nature of the charges, and decided to grant bail. Bail was ordered on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the IPC, the Witchcraft (Prevention) Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry harassment
  • IPC offences
  • criminal procedure
  • presumption of innocence
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16619 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-595 Year-2021 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Prince Kumar S/O Shankar Prasad Verma R/O Mohalla- Pachna Road,
                 Harizan Gali, P.S.-Kavaiya, District-Lakhisarai.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Pinki Devi W/O Prince Kumar Daughter of Shankar Prasad Gupta R/O
                 Mohalla- Mussalahpur Hat, Lohar Lane Mahendru, P.S- Kadamkuan, Distt.-
                 Patna.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Md Shadab Alam Wazdi, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Nand Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-03-2026                  Heard Mr. Md Shadab Alam Wazdi, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and Mr. Nand Kumar, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   25.05.2024, in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 595 of

                   2021, F.I.R. dated 10.09.2021                registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 365/34 of the

                   Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ Witch Practical Prevention

                   Act and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is of demand of

                   dowry and torture for the non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16619 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the

          present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in

          the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not

          committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. and the petitioner

          has been made accused merely on the ground that the petitioner

          is husband of Opposite Party No. 2 and petitioner has never

          demanded any dowry from the Opposite Party No. 2 or his

          family members.           He further submits that the police after

          investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and

          the petitioner is in custody since 25.05.2024.

                       5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State has vehemently opposed the prayer for            bail of the

          petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case

          other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of

          paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in

          the pending matter.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          as well as period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

          Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in

          connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 595 of 2021, subject
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16619 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         to the following conditions :-

                                      (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (3) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.             However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.