Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail subject to the conditions prescribed under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Neeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR (Vaishali P.S. Case No. 543 of 2025) alleged his involvement in assault with a pistol, theft of valuables and cash, and threats, invoking several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution argued the offences were serious and opposed bail, while the petitioner claimed innocence, alleging a personal dispute over a banquet hall booking and asserting the injuries were caused by a blunt object. The State contended the dispute stemmed from money lending. The court examined the merits of the bail application under Section 2(1)(d) and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023, considering the petitioner’s willingness to furnish a bail bond and comply with conditions. Finding no compelling reason to deny bail, the court ordered anticipatory bail, requiring a Rs.30,000 bond and compliance with statutory conditions. The order was pronounced by Justice Dr. Anshuman.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 2(1)(d) and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the allegations constitute offences warranting immediate arrest.
  • Whether the petitioner is likely to flee, tamper with evidence, or commit further offences if released.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • theft
  • bail bond
  • Section 482
  • Section 2(1)(d)
  • Vaishali

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16681 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-543 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Neeraj Kumar Son of Krishan Mohan Prasad Singh Resident of village and
                 P.S.- Vaishali, District - Vaishali.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   06-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 543 of 2025 lodged on 26.07.2025,

                   for the offence punishable under Section 191(2), 126(2), 115(2),

                   109, 352, 351(2) & 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against

                   three named accused persons including the present petitioner

                   and 10-15 unknown persons with allegation that they came at

                   the shop of the informant and started abusing him. The specific

                   allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted the

                   informant by pistol on his head, due to which, he injured. It has

                   been further alleged that the accused persons snatched golden

                   chain amounting Rs. 1,50,000/-, mobile phone amounting
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16681 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




          Rs.70,000/- and Rs. 40,000/- cash from the informant. The

          accused persons also threatened the informant not to file a case.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

          submits that the informant and the petitioner, both are resident

          of the same village and well known to each other. Counsel has

          taken defence that the petitioner has a banquet hall in Vaishali

          market and the informant wanted to book the said hall for his

          relative for free of cost. But for that, the petitioner was not ready

          and thereafter, the informant hatched a conspiracy against the

          petitioner and filed a criminal case against him. He further

          submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean

          as there is one case pending against him, in which, he is on bail.

          He also submits that on previous occasion, case diary and injury

          report were called for, and as per the injury report, it is clear that

          all injuries are simple in nature, caused by hard and blunt

          substance. Counsel submits that the petitioner is ready to fulfill

          all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner but submits that in the case diary, it has

          come that the dispute taken place between the informant and the

          petitioner is only due to money lending.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16681 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026
                                                         3/3




                                    6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of

                       this case, let the above named petitioner be released on

                       anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

                       Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing

                       bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as

                       mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the

                       satisfaction of J.M. 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection

                       with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 543 of 2025, subject to the

                       conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.



                                                                       (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.