Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shri Prasad Paswan @ Shree Prasad PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, holding that the absence of physical possession and reliance on a co‑accused’s confessional statement do not justify denial of bail.

Summary

Shri Prasad Paswan was implicated in a case involving the alleged recovery of 237 litres of Nepali liquor under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was recovered from his physical possession, and his alleged involvement stemmed solely from a co‑accused’s confessional statement, which he argued lacks evidentiary value. The State opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. The Court examined the lack of direct possession and the reliance on a confessional statement, finding insufficient grounds to deny bail. Consequently, the Court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and ordered anticipatory bail, subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, to be executed before the Special Judge, Excise Court, Jhanjharpur within six weeks of arrest or surrender.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the accused is not apprehended on the spot and no seizure is made from his possession.
  • Whether a confessional statement of a co‑accused can form the sole basis for denying anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • confessional statement
  • illegal liquor
  • excise law
  • Section 482
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16942 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2026 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Shri Prasad Paswan @ Shree Prasad Paswan Son of Fuleshwar Paswan
                 Resident of village - Dharhara, P.S.- Andharamath, District - Madhubani.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Andharamath P.S. Case No.05 of 2026 registered for the

                   offence under Section 274/275, 3(5) BNS, 2023 and 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per prosecution case, there is recovery of 237

                   liters of Nepali countrymade liquor.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and he has

                   falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the

                   petitioner further submits that the petitioner was not

                   apprehended on the spot and no recovery was made from the

                   conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel

                   for the petitioner next submits that petitioner’s name come on
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16942 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                      2/2




                    the confessional statement of co-accused, which carries no

                    evidentiary value.

                                 5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail

                    application.

                                 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner was not

                    apprehended on the spot and no recovery was made from the

                    conscious physical possession of the petitioner and that he

                    appears to have been implicated on the confessional statement

                    of co-accused, which carries no evidentiary value, this court is

                    inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                 7. Accordingly, the petitioner above named, in the

                    event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

                    within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on

                    anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of

                    Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                    amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge,

                    Excise Act, Jhanjharpur in connection with Andharamath P.S.

                    Case No.05 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down under

                    Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.


                                             (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

Prakash Narayan
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.