Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Brajesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a Special NDPS case for allegedly selling 39 grams of brown sugar to co‑accused Gaurav Kumar, who later recovered the narcotics. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that no narcotics were seized from his possession, his name only appeared in the co‑accused’s statement, and he has three prior criminal cases for which he is already on bail. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the NDPS offences and the petitioner’s criminal antecedents. The Court considered the length of custody, lack of direct recovery, and the petitioner’s bail history, and ordered his release on bail with a Rs 10,000 bond and two sureties. The bail was conditioned on regular court appearances, verification of antecedents, periodic reporting to the Superintendent of Police, and possible cancellation for non‑compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in an NDPS case involving alleged sale of narcotics despite prior criminal antecedents
  • Whether the absence of direct seizure from the accused’s possession justifies bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • narcotics
  • criminal antecedents
  • conditions of bail
  • Indian criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17071 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2025 Thana- JANKINAGAR District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Brajesh Kumar @ Brajesh Yadav S/O Suresh Yadav @ Suresh Prasad Yadav
                 R/O Village- Jhalighat, Ward No. 6, P.S- Jankinagar, Distt.- Purnea.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   11-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Special

                   Case No. 273 of 2025, arising out of Jankinagar P.S. Case No.

                   307 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 8(c),

                   8(a), 21(b) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

                   Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he had sold

                   smack to the apprehended accused namely Gaurav Kumar, who

                   disclosed that he had purchased the same from the petitioner

                   who had fled away leaving his scooty behind and on search total

                   39.00 grams of brown sugar was recovered from the conscious

                   possession of the co-accused Gaurav Kumar.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated merely because he carries
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17071 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026
                                            2/3




          three criminal antecedents and two among them are of similar

          nature. It has further been submitted that the petitioner was not

          apprehended at the place of occurrence rather his name has

          surfaced in the statement of co-accused Gaurav Kumar from

          whom the recovery was made. It has next been submitted that

          no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner

          or from his house and in fact, the person from whom the said

          recovery was made has been granted bail by a coordinate Bench

          of this Court on 22.01.2026 and the order of the same has been

          brought on record by way of Annexure-P/3. Lastly, it has been

          submitted that though the petitioner has three criminal

          antecedents but he is on bail in such cases. The petitioner is in

          custody since 30.09.2025.

                       5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

                       6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

          and taking into account the period of custody, the petitioner is

          directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the

          sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge

          (N.D.P.S.) Act, Purnea in connection with Special Case No. 273

          of 2025, arising out of Jankinagar P.S. Case No. 307 of 2025,
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17071 of 2026(2) dt.11-03-2026
                                                        3/3




                      subject to the following conditions:

                                                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close
                                                      relative of the petitioner and the other shall be a
                                                      local resident;
                                                                    (ii) the petitioner will remain
                                                      present on each and every date fixed by the Court
                                                      below, if so required by the learned Trial Court;
                                                                    (iii) in case of absence on two
                                                      consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of
                                                      the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will
                                                      liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned;
                                                                    (iv) the Court below shall verify the
                                                      criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case
                                                      at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has
                                                      concealed his criminal antecedent, the court
                                                      below shall take step for cancellation of bail
                                                      bonds of the petitioner. However, the acceptance
                                                      of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned
                                                      order shall not be delayed for purpose of the
                                                      same on in the name of verification.
                                                                    (v) in view of the antecedents of the
                                                      petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear
                                                      before the Superintendent of Police concerned
                                                      within fifteen days of his release with a copy of
                                                      this order and every two weeks thereafter for the
                                                      next nine months. The conduct of the petitioner
                                                      will be kept under watch in this period by the
                                                      Superintendent of Police concerned and, if it is
                                                      found wanting in any respect, a report shall be
                                                      made to the court concerned by him to initiate a
                                                      proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of
                                                      misuse of bail. After reporting to the
                                                      Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be
                                                      filed by the petitioner before the court concerned.


                                   7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

                      in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                               (Sourendra Pandey, J)
krishna/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.