Patna High Court
Mahesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The court held that the petitioner’s ownership of the vehicle alone does not establish participation in the alleged offence and therefore granted bail subject to conditions.
Summary
Mahesh Kumar, the owner of a Mahindra pick‑up van, was implicated in a case (Kabaiya P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025) for alleged black marketing of subsidised rice, alleged under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The police seized 65 gunny bags of rice during a raid and the driver identified Kumar as the van’s owner. Kumar contended that the vehicle was hired on rent and he had no knowledge of any illegal activity. The State opposed his bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The High Court observed that mere ownership of the vehicle, without any material linking Kumar to the alleged black marketing, does not justify denial of bail and ordered his release on bail with specified surety conditions, also invoking Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner’s mere ownership of the vehicle, without evidence of participation, is sufficient ground to deny bail under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
- Whether the court can grant bail in the absence of material establishing the petitioner’s complicity in the alleged black‑marketing offence.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 303(2), 317(2)
Subjects
- bail
- black marketing
- subsidised rice
- vehicle ownership
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- suspicion
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17188 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2025 Thana- Kavaiya District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
Mahesh Kumar, Son of Rajendra Saw, Resident of Village - Narayanpur, P.S. -
Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Anand, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
5 24-06-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and the
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Kabaiya P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025 registered
for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) and 317 (2) of
the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The Assistant District Supply Officer, Lakhisarai,
acting on a tip off regarding black marketing, conducted raid
and intercepted a Mahindra Pick-up van, having registration no.
BR 21GB 1483 and recovered 65 gunny bags of subsidized
government rice. The driver of the Pick-up van disclosed the
name of the petitioner, as the owner of the Pick-up van.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that
only on account of the petitioner being the owner of the Pick-up
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17188 of 2026(5) dt.24-06-2026
2/3
van, in question, his name has been implicated in this case. In
fact, the said Pick-up van was running for the transportation of
goods on rent by the driver, and the petitioner was not even
acquainted with the fact that the rice, which was being
transported, was for the purpose of black marketing. The entire
case is based on suspicion that the seized rice was Government
subsidized rice, as neither any complaint has ever been made
nor during the course of investigation the fact of black
marketing has unearthed. The petitioner bears one criminal
antecedent, as has been disclosed in supplementary affidavit,
however, he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the
proceedings of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State
vehemently opposes the bail application.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made on
behalf of the parties and considering the fact that the name of
the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on account
of he being the owner of Mahindra Pick-up van, which was
hired on rent, and no materials have been collected during the
course of investigation suggesting his complicity, let the
petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender
before the court below within four weeks from the date of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17188 of 2026(5) dt.24-06-2026
3/3
receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai or his successor in
connection with Kabaiya P.S. Case No. 137 of 2025, subject to
the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further
condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close relative
of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
uday/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.