Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Guddu Ray @ Manmath Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that, subject to verification of the deposit, the bail bonds shall be accepted and the time for furnishing them extended.

Summary

Guddu Ray and Komal Ray were granted anticipatory bail on condition that they deposit a demand draft of Rs.3,80,000. They filed a modification application seeking verification of the deposit and an extension of time to furnish the bail bonds. The petitioners produced a photocopy of the deposit certificate, and the court directed verification of the deposit. Upon verification, the court ordered that the bail bonds be accepted and extended the time for furnishing them by six weeks. The application was consequently disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail order can be modified to extend the time for furnishing bail bonds
  • Whether the court can accept a photocopy of a deposit certificate for verification of the required security

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • modification application
  • bail bond
  • extension of time
  • verification of deposit
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17205 of 2026
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46631 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE
                                                    District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Guddu Ray @ Manmath Kumar Ray S/o- Surendra Nath Ray @ Shobhi Ray
                  Resident of village- Kondanda PS- Shahkund- Distt Bhagalpur, A/P- Moh-
                  Bhikhanpur, Trimurti Chowk Near M.N Tower Apartment, Ps- Ishachak
                  Dist-Bhagalpur
           2.    Komal Ray @ Neelam Ray W/o- Guddu Ray @ Manmath Kumar Ray R/v-
                 Kondanda Ps- Shahkund Dist- Bhagalpur

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
           2.    Tripti Sinha @ Tripti Dinesh Mandal W/o- Late Dinesh Mandal R/v-
                 Anandgarh Colony, Tilkamanjhi Ps- Tilkamanjhi Dist- Bhagalpur

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr.Dharmveer
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. This modification application has been filed on

                   behalf of the petitioner for modification of the order dated

                   17.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46631 of 2025. The

                   petitioners have also prayed for extension of time for furnishing

                   the bail bonds.

                                3. The petitioners were granted anticipatory bail with

                   a condition that they will deposit a demand draft of Rs.

                   3,80,000/- before the learned ACJM -IX, Bhagalpur/concerned
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17205 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    Court. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioners has

                    produced a photocopy of the certificate issued by the Court

                    below and has submitted that the petitioners have deposited the

                    amount in question.

                                 4. In view of the above, the Court below is directed to

                    verify the deposit of amount of Rs. 3,80,000/- by the petitioners

                    and if the petitioners have deposited the said amount then their

                    bail bonds shall be accepted as has been directed vide order

                    dated 17.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46631 of 2025.

                                 5. It is made clear that the time granted for furnishing

                    the bail bonds is also extended by six weeks from today.

                                 6. With the aforesaid directions, this application is

                    disposed of.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.