Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Batohi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond and sureties.

Summary

Batohi Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged seizure of 140 litres of country-made liquor from the bank of the Ganga river. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the liquor, that the seizure was made from an open place not belonging to him, and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. during the seizure. The State opposed bail, citing four prior criminal cases, one of which was of a similar nature. After hearing both sides, the Court considered the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner and the procedural lapse, and decided to grant bail. The bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Additional District and Sessions Judge‑VII‑cum‑Exclusive Special Excise Court‑II, Lakhisarai.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act given the facts of the case.
  • Whether the failure to comply with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. during seizure warrants bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • procedural lapse
  • prior convictions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17352 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRIYA District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Batohi Kumar, S/o Karu Yadav, Resident of village - Pipariya, P.S - Pipariya,
                 District - Lakhisarai
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Dharmveer, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Pipariya P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the

                   bank of Ganga river from a bathan, altogether 140 liters of country

                   made liquor was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the case of the

                   prosecution, three persons started fleeing away and the local

                   villagers have disclosed the name of this petitioner. Nothing has
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17352 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026
                                                         2/2




                       been recovered from the possession of this petitioner.            The

                       recovery was made from an open place. The bathan does not

                       belong to this petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police

                       personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of B.N.S.S. while

                       making the seizure. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody

                       since 24.01.2026.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                       opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner

                       is having criminal antecedent of four cases. Out of which one is of

                       similar nature.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

                       of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

                       like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

                       District and Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Exclusive Special Excise

                       Court-II, Lakhisarai in connection with Pipariya P.S. Case No. 90

                       of 2025.


                                                           (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.