Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vinod KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court held that it may permit the petitioner to withdraw the application and dismiss it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, filed an application in the High Court of Judicature at Patna under Criminal Miscellaneous No.17366 of 2024. During the hearing on 23-03-2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court granted the request, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The court expressly clarified that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying case.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending application?
  • Whether the court can dismiss the application as withdrawn without addressing its merits?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • procedural law
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • court order

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17366 of 2024
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-1998 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Lakhisarai
                   ======================================================
                   Vinod Kumar

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                   The State of Bihar and Anr.

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate
                   For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                         ORAL ORDER

2     23-03-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                  2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for

                     petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.

                                  3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as

                     withdrawn.

                                  5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any

                     opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.