Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, granting bail subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Singh, sought anticipatory bail after learning that his motorcycle was seized with 27 litres of illicit country-made liquor in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not involved in the offence, having lent the motorcycle to a third party, Akhilesh Kumar Singh, and asserted a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seizure implicated the petitioner. The Court, after considering the petitioner's claim of innocence and clean record, granted anticipatory bail subject to a cash bond, sureties, and a condition to deposit Rs. 25,000 to a charitable institution. The bail bonds were to be verified for genuineness and the petitioner’s antecedent before acceptance.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the conditions imposed by the Court are lawful and sufficient to safeguard the investigation.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • clean antecedent
  • illegal liquor seizure
  • motor vehicle

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17410 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2020 Thana- RISIYAP District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Rahul Singh Son of Dhirendra Singh R/o village Ghordaur, P.S.- Obra,
                 District - Aurangabad

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Pronoti Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with Risiup P.S. Case No. 85 of 2020 registered for

                   the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the recovery is of

                   total 27 litre of country-made liquor from a motorcycle.

                                    4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

                   the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

                   been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that though the

                   said motorcycle from which liquor has been recovered belongs

                   to the petitioner but the petitioner is not involved in the crime as

                   he had given his motorcycle to one Akhilesh Kumar Singh who
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17410 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                            2/3




          misused his trust. The name of the petitioner has come during

          investigation. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

                           5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer

          for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                          6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application

          is allowed.

                          7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within

          four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special

          Judge, Excise Court No. II, Aurangabad/ concerned Court below

          in connection with Risiup P.S. Case No. 85 of 2020, subject to

          the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of

          Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

                        8. This is also subject to the condition that the

          petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in

          Ramakrishna Math, Village Jharha (near Matua Pahar), P.O.

          Gurua, Gayaji and produce the receipt of the same before the

          Court below. The bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted

          after verifying the genuineness of the receipt produced by the

          petitioner.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17410 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                                          3/3




                                     9. At the time of accepting the bail bonds of the

                        petitioner, the Court below shall verify the statement of the

                        petitioner that he has clean antecedent. The bail bonds of the

                        petitioner shall only be accepted if it is found that he has clean

                        antecedent.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.