Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nirodha Devi @ Nirodhi KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Nirodha Devi, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have abused the deceased. She claimed she was falsely implicated, asserting that the actual assailants were Rupesh and Govind, and highlighted that she is a woman with only one prior criminal record and has been in custody since 16‑12‑2025. The petitioner’s counsel sought regular bail, undertaking cooperation with the trial, while the Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the submissions and the petitioner’s gender, allowed the bail application. Accordingly, the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act considering the nature of the offences and the petitioner’s circumstances.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • gender
  • Arms Act
  • Section 103
  • Section 61
  • Section 27
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17457 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2025 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Nirodha Devi @ Nirodhi Kumari Wife of Rupesh Yadav Resident of Village-
                 Belasara Dira ward no. 05, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Raniganj P.S. Case No. 459/2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) of B.N.S. and Section

                   27 of Arms Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is a woman

                   who is accused of abusing the deceased.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. Learned counsel further submits that Rupesh and

                   Govind are assailants of the deceased. Petitioner has one

                   criminal antecedent and she is in custody since 16.12.2025. The

                   petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17457 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                                     5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

                        for regular bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of

                        the parties and the fact that the petitioner is a woman, this

                        application for regular bail is allowed.

                                     7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

                        released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                        Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                        satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

                        1st, Araria concerned Court below in connection with Raniganj

                        P.S. Case No. 459/2025.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.