Patna High Court
TarikversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.
Summary
Petitioner Tarik was arrested in a case under sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act, where 11.01 grams of cannabis resin was seized from co‑accused Ravi Kumar. The petitioner contended that no contraband was found on him, that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (Control) Act while preparing the seizure list, and that he has no prior criminal record. He had been in judicial custody since 18‑01‑2026, while Ravi Kumar had already been granted bail in a related proceeding. The State opposed the bail application, but the court, after hearing both sides, found the petitioner’s circumstances sufficient to merit regular bail. Accordingly, the court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act given that the seized narcotics were recovered from a co‑accused and procedural lapses in the seizure list.
- Whether the petitioner’s lack of criminal antecedent and the bail granted to the co‑accused affect the bail decision.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- regular bail
- NDPS Act
- section 8
- section 21
- seizure procedure
- Section 105
- co‑accused
- criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17532 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2025 Thana- ABADPUR District- Katihar
======================================================
Tarik Son of Majibur Rahman R/o Village - Balukhora, P.S. - Aabadpur, Dist.
- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
3 01-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case
registered for the offence punishable under sections 8(c)/21(b) of
the NDPS Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that from the
possession of one co-accused Ravi Kumar, altogether 11.01 gram
of smack was recovered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned
counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been
recovered from the possession of this petitioner rather the recovery
has been made from the possession of co-accused Ravi Kumar.
The name of this petitioner has transpired on the disclosure of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17532 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026
2/2
Ravi Kumar who stated that this petitioner also shares the
proceeds of the sell. The witnesses of the seizure list are police
personnel and police has not followed Section 105 of BNSS while
preparing seizure list. A statement has been made in para-3 of this
petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.
Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 18.01.2026.
It has further been submitted that Ravi Kumar has already been
granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 20615 of 2026. The
case of this petitioner stands on better footing.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently
opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with
Abadpur P.S. Case No. 138 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned Principal District and
Sessions Judge, Katihar.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
shubham/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.