Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Parwej Alam @ M. ParwedversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Parwej Alam, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 82 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNS). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with others, entered the informant’s house armed, threatened, and assaulted family members, with injuries described as simple. The petitioner claimed innocence, attributing the charges to a land dispute and asserting a clean background. The State opposed the bail, but the court noted the petitioner’s lack of serious criminal antecedent and the nature of the alleged injury. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNS, including cooperation with investigation and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC and Section 482(2) BNS
  • Whether the alleged offences and the petitioner’s criminal antecedent justify denial of bail
  • Whether the conditions imposed are sufficient to safeguard the investigation and trial

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • criminal antecedent
  • land dispute
  • bail conditions
  • Criminal Miscellaneous

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17533 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2025 Thana- MAHALGAON District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Parwej Alam @ M. Parwed Son of Naimuddin Resident Of Village-
                 Prasadpur Dumaria, Ward No 11, Police Station- Mahalgaon, District -Araria

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ajit Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 74, 329(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the

                   BNS in connection with Mahalgaon P.S.Case No. 82 of 2025.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant

                   along with his other family members was sitting at his house,

                   then suddenly the FIR named accused persons, armed with

                   various weapons, entered his house and started abusing and

                   asked to vacate the house, or else the same will be set ablaze. It

                   is alleged that the accused persons assaulted the family

                   members of the informant and torn the clothes of the female

                   members of the informant’s family members.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17533 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

          present case due to previous enmity and land dispute. The

          petitioner has clean background.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                       6. Although, there is allegation against the petitioner

          of having assaulted with farsa causing injury on head, the injury

          report describes the injury as simple in nature. The petitioner

          has got clean antecedent and on account of disclosures made in

          para-7 of the bail application, it appears that this matter relates

          to case and counter case, under these circumstances,           I am

          inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be

          enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

          Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Araria

          in connection with Mahalgaon P.S.Case No. 82 of 2025,

          subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the

          Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya

          Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and subject to further condition
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17533 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     that :-

                                  (i) the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation/

                     trial.

                                  (ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the

                     criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that

                     the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court

                     below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                     petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process

                     would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.


                                              (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

HR/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.