Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond and conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, was arrested on 4 February 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 2 February 2026 alleging seizure of 3,293.40 litres of foreign liquor. He was charged under Section 281 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amended). The petitioner contended that he had a clean antecedent, that the truck from which the liquor was recovered was overturned and he was taken for medical treatment, and that the truck was searched in his absence, violating procedural requirements under Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court, noting the lack of the petitioner’s presence during the search and his clean record, granted bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and imposed standard conditions for cooperation and non‑tampering with evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case involving alleged illegal possession of foreign liquor under Sections 281 of the BNSS and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the alleged procedural lapses (search conducted in the accused’s absence and non‑compliance with Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023) justify granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • foreign liquor
  • excise
  • procedural lapse
  • Section 281
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal antecedent
  • Section 103
  • Section 105

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17558 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2026 Thana- KUSHESHWARASTHAN District-
                                                        Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Bittu Kumar S/O Late Ram Udgar Ray R/O Village - Jitwarpur,P.S - Muffasil,
                 District - Samastipur

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr.Nawal Kishor Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Ms.Nirmala Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-03-2026                   Heard Mr.Nawal Kishor Prasad,learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Ms.Nirmala Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the

                   State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   04.02.2026 in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S. Case

                   No. 23 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 02.02.2026 registered for the

                   offence punishable         under Section 281 of BNS and Section

                   30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amended).

                                3. Recovery is of 3293.40 liters of foreign liquor.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

                   submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation

                   as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner

                   has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. It appears
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17558 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026
                                            2/3




          from the FIR that the truck in question was overturned on

          30.01.2026 and the petitioner was taken to Primary Health

          Centre Satighat for treatment and on 02.02.2026 and the truck in

          question was searched on 02.02.2026 in absence of the

          petitioner and police has shown that the recovery has been made

          from the Truck in question. Learned counsel for the petitioner

          submits that the petitioner is cleaner of the truck in question and

          he has not concern at with the alleged recovery of illicit liquor

          and petitioner has been made accused in the present case and

          there is non-compliance of Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023

          and the petitioner is in custody since 04.02.2026.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean

          antecedent and the truck in question was not searched in

          presence of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge-II (Excise Act),

          Darbhanga in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S. Case

          No. 23 of 2026,with the following conditions:-

                       (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17558 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026
                                                           3/3




                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.