Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pannalal SoniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court denied regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Pannalal Soni applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 75(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8, 10 and 12 of the POCSO Act, alleging molestation of a nine‑year‑old girl. He has been in custody since 21 January 2026. The court examined the nature and gravity of the alleged offences, particularly the sexual assault of a minor. Considering the seriousness of the charges, the judge was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the application for regular bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused in a case involving alleged molestation of a minor under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • sexual offences
  • child molestation
  • POCSO Act
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17569 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2026 Thana- CHOUTARWA District- West Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Pannalal Soni S/o- Late Motilal Soni Resident of Vill- Siktour, P.S.-
                  Chautarwa, Dist- West Champaran
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar
            2.     Mrs. X W/o- Mr. Y R/v- Siktour Ps- Chautarwa Dist- West Champaran
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sitesh Kashyap
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    24-03-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                    Chautarwa P.S. Case No. 22 of 2026 registered for the offence

                    under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 75(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of

                    the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8, 10 and 12 of

                    the POCSO Act.

                                 3. The petitioner is accused of molesting a nine years

                    old girl. He is in custody since 21.01.2026.

                                 4. Considering the nature and the gravity of the

                    offence, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

                    Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands rejected.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.