Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Sunny Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS No. 527 of 2025) alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for transporting and selling 6.375 litres of foreign liquor recovered from a bush. The prosecution alleged his involvement, but the petitioner was not apprehended at the scene and no liquor was found in his physical possession. He asserted innocence and highlighted his clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. Considering the lack of direct recovery from the petitioner, the open‑field nature of the seizure, and his no‑record antecedent, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, including cooperation with investigation and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
  • Whether the facts of non‑apprehension and absence of seized goods in the petitioner's possession justify the grant of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether conditions such as bail bond, sureties, and verification of criminal antecedent can be imposed.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • section 30(a)
  • section 482(2)
  • foreign liquor
  • criminal antecedent
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17609 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-527 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Sunny Kumar S/o Uday Ram R/o vill - Dumarkol, P.S.- Rajauli, Distt.-
                 Nawada

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 527 of 2025, registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act, 2022.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that there

                   was recovery of total 6.375 liters foreign liquor from the bush. It

                   is alleged that the petitioner was involved in transportation,

                   storage and selling the aforesaid liquor. The petitioner managed

                   to flee away from the spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. The petitioner has not been arrested from the spot
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17609 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          nor anything has been recovered from the conscious physical

          possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the

          petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of

          anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the fact that the petitioner was not

          apprehended from the spot and nothing has been recovered from

          the conscious physical possession of the petitioner and also the

          fact that the recovery has been made from a bush, which is an

          open place and taking into into account that the petitioner has no

          criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of

          anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his

          arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks

          from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Spl. Excise

          Court-II, Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 527

          of 2025 , subject to the conditions laid down under section

          482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 as

          also further condition that:-

                       (i)    the     petitioner      shall    co-operate   in   the
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17609 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                          3/3




                        investigation/trial.

                                     (ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the

                        criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that

                        the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court

                        below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                        petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process

                        would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.



                                                 (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.