Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vishal Bind @ Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail, holding that the lack of seizure from the petitioner’s possession and the defective memo justified bail with conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Vishal Bind, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a 2018 case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, where police, acting on secret information, recovered 20 litres of illicit liquor but did not seize any liquor from the petitioner. The petitioner fled the scene and contended that he had no possession of the contraband and was falsely implicated. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court noted that the seizure memo lacked signatures of two independent witnesses, casting doubt on the legality of the seizure, and that no material was recovered from the petitioner’s conscious possession. Consequently, the Court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000, two sureties, cooperation with the investigation, and verification of any criminal antecedent. The bail order was conditioned on compliance with Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the seizure memo is defective and no contraband was found in the petitioner’s possession
  • Whether the procedural lapse in the search and seizure undermines the prosecution’s case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • search and seizure
  • procedural defect
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • bail conditions
  • criminal antecedent verification

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17614 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-787 Year-2018 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Vishal Bind @ Vishal Kumar Son of Gorakh Bind @ Gorakh Prasad Resident
                 of Village- Ujiar Tola, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :      Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv
                                                  Mr. Raju Kumar Singh, Adv
                                                  Ms. Drishti Mohan, Adv
                 For the State             :      Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                  2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 787 of 2018, registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition &

                   Excise Act.

                                  3. As per allegation, the police, on a secret

                   information, reached the place of occurrence and recovered 20

                   liters of country-made liquor from the spot. Seeing the police

                   party, the petitioner fled away.

                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

                   falsely been implication in the present case. Nothing has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17614 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          recovered from his conscious physical possession.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of

          anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the fact that the petitioner was not

          apprehended on the spot and further, no recovery has been made

          from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner and

          also taking into account that the search and seizure memo has

          not been signed by two independent witnesses which puts a

          question mark on the validity of the seizure itself, this Court is

          inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his

          arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks

          from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise

          Judge-1, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case

          No. 787 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under

          section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

          and subject to the further condition that:-

                       (i)    the     petitioner      shall    co-operate   in   the

          investigation/trial.

                       (ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17614 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                          3/3




                        criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that

                        the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court

                        below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                        petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process

                        would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.



                                                 (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.