Radhika DeviversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17691 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2026 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
           1.    Radhika Devi Wife of Birendra Ram Resident of village- Sabdala, Ps-
                 Nasriganj, Dist- Rohtas
           2.    Nitesh Kumar @ Mitesh Kumar Son of Birendra Ram Resident of village-
                 Sabdala, Ps- Nasriganj, Dist- Rohtas


                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                        Versus

                 The State of Bihar



                                                                             ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                                   ORAL ORDER

2   25-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case no.

                   16 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352

                   and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states

                   that on asking his uncle not to abuse his mother and

                   grandmother, it is stated that his uncle including his family
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17691 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                            2/3




          members i.e. the informant’s chachi (petitioner no.1) as also his

          uncle’s son (petitioner no.2) assaulted him with sword, farsa etc

          causing injuries.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits in reference

          to the injury report (Annexure-P/2) that the allegations are false and

          incorrect. No such occurrence has taken place as alleged in the FIR.

          In any case, the injuries have been found to be simple in nature

          which would be evident from the contents of the injury report

          (Annexure-P/2). It is a case of trivial dispute between the family

          members. The petitioners are in custody since 12.1.2026 and have no

          criminal antecedent.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

          for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the

          relationship between the parties, the injuries on the informant

          having been found to be simple in nature, the petitioners being

          in custody since 12.1.2026 and not having any criminal

          antecedent, both the petitioners above named are directed to be

          enlarged on bail in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case no. 16 of

          2026 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

          Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17691 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate,

                     Bikramganj, Rohtas.



                                                 (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U      T