Sunny KumarversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17699 of 2026
                       Arising out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Sunny Kumar Son of Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav Resident of village -
                 Mahsai, Police Station - Rajauli, District - Nawada.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr.Yogendra Kumar, APP
                 For the Informant       :        Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   07-05-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in Rajauli P.S. Case No.

                   298 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of BNS.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is of attacking

                   the brother of the informant with blade. The doctor has certified

                   the injury to be grievous.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   parties are agnates and there is land dispute between them and

                   Title Suit No. 540 of 2024 is pending before learned Sub-judge-

                   I, Nawada. He further submits that there is case and counter-
                   Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17699 of 2026(4) dt.07-05-2026
                              2/3




case between the parties.

           5. Learned counsel for the Informant as well as learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently

opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

the Informant submits that the injury is grave.

           6. Considering that the parties are agnates and there is

case and counter-case between the parties, this Court is inclined

to grant bail to the petitioner.

           7.   Let    the     petitioner,         above     named,        be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief

Judicial     Magistrate,       Nawada         in    connection          with

Rajauli P.S. Case No. 298 of 2025, subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the

Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

           8. It is made clear that any observation made

herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for

the purpose of          adjudication of             the    present      bail

application. Such observations shall not be construed

as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not
                         Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17699 of 2026(4) dt.07-05-2026
                                    3/3




           influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

           manner.



                                    (Ansul, J)
Vikash/-

U      T