Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Awadhesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Summary

Awadhesh Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered on 29‑01‑2025 under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Arms Act for possession of arms with a forged licence. His earlier bail application was rejected, but he remained in custody for almost a year and the charge sheet had not yet been framed. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the court had earlier permitted a fresh bail application after ten months of custody if the trial was not concluded. The State opposed the bail. The court, considering the long period of detention and the absence of framed charges, ordered that bail be granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs 30,000 and compliance with conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS, subject to charge framing if not already done.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the charge sheet not being framed and prolonged pre‑trial detention.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • pre‑trial detention
  • charge framing
  • Arms Act
  • possession of arms with fake licence
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 480(3)
  • bond
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1770 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Awadhesh Yadav S/O Harihar Yadab R/O Village - Bansibigha, P.s.- Belaganj,
                 District -Gaya

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Chakand P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025, lodged on 29.01.2025, under

                   Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) & 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 25(1-B) (a) & 26 of the Arms

                   Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide order

                   dated 02.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34171 of 2025.

                   Counsel further submits that the present case primarily relates to

                   an offence under the Arms Act, as the petitioner was found in

                   possession of arms with a fake licence. Counsel further submits

                   that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.01.2025 and
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1770 of 2026(2) dt.16-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                    nearly one year of custody is about to lapse.

                                 4. Learned counsel further submits that, at the time of

                    rejection of the earlier bail application, liberty was granted to

                    the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after completion of ten

                    months of custody in the event the trial did not conclude within

                    the said period. Learned counsel also submits that, according to

                    his information, charges have not been framed till date.

                                 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

                    bail.

                                 6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case

                    and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above

                    named, be granted bail, after framing of charge, if not

                    framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty

                    thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1) (d) of the BNSS, 2023

                    to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Vth,

                    Gaya, in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025,

                    subject to the following conditions as laid down under Section

                    480(3) of the BNSS.


                                                                        (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Aman Kumar/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.