Patna High Court
Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.
Summary
Manoj Kumar, owner of a godown, was arrested on 14 January 2026 after a seizure of 1,491 litres of codeine cough syrup in connection with FIR dated 13 January 2026 under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, asserting a clean criminal record and arguing that his only alleged involvement was ownership of the premises, not the illegal possession. The State opposed bail, citing non‑compliance with Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023. The Court examined the facts, noted the petitioner’s clean antecedent, and considered the statutory provisions, ultimately granting bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and imposing conditions regarding trial cooperation, evidence tampering, and verification of antecedents. The order directs that bail shall not be delayed for antecedent verification and sets out consequences for breach of conditions.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite alleged non‑compliance with Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS, 2023.
- Whether the petitioner’s ownership of the godown alone suffices to justify continued detention under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- BNSS, 2023 — s. 103, 105
Subjects
- bail
- codeine cough syrup
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- BNSS 2023
- criminal antecedent
- seizure
- non‑compliance
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17707 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2026 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
Manoj Kumar Son of Late Mohan Prasad Resident of Village - Pakki Goraiya,
Mahavir Sthan, P.S.- Khajekalan, P.O.- Patna City, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashutosh Nath, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Anita Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 19-03-2026 Heard Mr.Ashutosh Nath, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Ms.Anita Kumari, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
14.01.2026 in connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 40 of
2026, F.I.R. dated 13.01.2026 registered for the offence
punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise
Act.
3. Recovery is of 1491 liters of Codeine Cough Syrup.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. It appears from
the FIR as well as the seizure list that the recovery has been
made form the Godown in question. It appears from the FIR that
700 liters of codeine cough syrup has been recovered from the
Tempo in question and 791 litres of codeine cough syrup has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17707 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026
2/3
been recovered from the Godown in question and the petitioner
has been made accused in the present case merely on the ground
that the petitioner is owner of the Godown in question and there
is non-compliance of Sections 103 and 105 of BNSS, 2023 and
the petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2026.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean
antecedent and there is non-compliance of Sections 103 and 105
of BNSS, 2023, let the petitioner, above named, be released on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Exclusive Special Court-Excise, Patna City, Patna in
connection with Alamganj P.S. Case No. 40 of 2026, with the
following conditions:-
(I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and
on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17707 of 2026(2) dt.19-03-2026
3/3
for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.